Eddy Current Braking Arms for Progressive Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mechanical braking systems on zip-line and coaster rides lack progressive speed control, fail to accommodate riders of varying sizes, and cannot be effectively stopped at any point along the track, posing safety concerns due to limited control over speed and potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of eddy current-based braking systems using movable arms or arm assemblies with magnets that interact with non-ferrous conductive materials, generating a braking force through centrifugal or inertial motion, allowing for progressive braking and control of the trolley's speed and position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional mechanical braking systems are used on trolleys, then braking force is provided, but progressive speed control and ability to stop at any point along the track is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed controlVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The braking arm is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically adjust its position relative to the conductive plate. The arm can be positioned closer to or farther from the plate to modulate the braking force, enabling progressive speed control and the ability to stop at any point along the track rather than relying on fixed mechanical contact points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of magnetic field strength by adjusting the distance between the magnet on the braking arm and the conductive plate. By varying this distance, the eddy current generation and resulting braking force can be precisely controlled, providing continuous speed regulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed mechanical braking systems are used, then braking is provided, but accommodation of riders of varying sizes and weights is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider accommodationVSAvoidsystem adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system automatically adapts to different riders and weights through the movable arm design. As the trolley moves along the track, the braking arm naturally positions itself at optimal distances from the conductive plate based on the trolley's speed and load, eliminating the need for manual adjustments or different braking configurations for different rider sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The single movable braking arm system with magnetic field interaction serves all riders regardless of size or weight. The same braking mechanism universally accommodates different trolley loads by dynamically adjusting the magnetic coupling strength, replacing the need for multiple fixed braking systems or complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If grade-based braking is used on zip-line tracks, then speed control is attempted, but control over trolley speed is insufficient due to variation with rider weight and slope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed controlVSAvoidspeed reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical grade-based braking system (which relies on track slope and friction) with an electromagnetic braking system using eddy currents. This substitution provides more reliable and predictable speed control because the magnetic braking force can be precisely regulated by adjusting the arm position, independent of rider weight variations and track slope changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides progressive braking, effective speed control for riders of different sizes, and the ability to stop the trolley at any point, enhancing safety by reducing collisions and accommodating varying rider weights and sizes without modifying the system.

Implementation Method 1

one or more magnets that move relative to one or more non-ferrous conductive materials so as to generate eddy currents and provide braking force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

Movement of the one or more magnets may be imparted by centrifugal or inertial forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS10065507B1Speed restriction systems using eddy currents
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 ZIP-FLYER LLC
  • US10065507B1 patent drawing
  • US10065507B1 patent drawing
  • US10065507B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The current subject matter describes a device and system including one or more movable arms containing one or more magnets that are caused to move relative to a non-ferrous material by motion of the device to generate eddy currents that cause a braking of the device. Devices of this disclosure may include a wheel with arms having magnets and that move from centrifugal force caused by rotation of the arms within a wheel. The applied braking force is controlled due, in part, to the configuration of the non-ferrous material in which eddy currents are generated. Devices may additionally or alternately include arms with magnets that move relative to a non-ferrous rail when the device moves to generate eddy currents that cause additional braking of the device.