Eddy Current Sensor Calibration for CMP Thickness Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the thickness of conductive layers on wafers in CMP processes face challenges in accuracy, particularly at low and high thickness ranges, with eddy current sensors struggling to provide reliable measurements due to non-monotonic functions and high error rates when using modulus of impedance or polynomial curve fits.

Innovation Solution

The use of an eddy current sensor calibrated to measure magnetic flux density changes, combined with a calibration curve that correlates thickness to measured values using an analytic function with infinite order terms or smooth piecewise continuous interpolation, allowing for accurate thickness calculation within 5% error across a wide range of thicknesses from 1 kÅ to 20 kÅ.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If polynomial curve fits or modulus of impedance are used for calibration, then the calibration process is simple, but measurement precision deteriorates at low and high thickness ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration process simplicityVSAvoidthickness measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration curve is divided into multiple segments, each corresponding to a specific thickness range. Different mathematical functions are applied to different segments: a first function for low thickness ranges, a second function for intermediate ranges, and a third function for high thickness ranges. This segmentation allows each segment to be optimized for its specific range, resolving the contradiction by maintaining measurement precision across the entire thickness spectrum while keeping each individual calibration segment relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different mathematical functions with different characteristics are applied to different thickness ranges. The first function is optimized for low thickness measurements, the second for intermediate ranges, and the third for high ranges. This local optimization ensures that each region of the measurement spectrum has the appropriate calibration characteristics, thereby maintaining high measurement precision across all thickness values while avoiding the need for a single overly complex calibration model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single mathematical function is used for the entire thickness range, then the calibration model is simple, but measurement precision deteriorates across different thickness ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration model complexityVSAvoidthickness measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration model is segmented into multiple functions, each valid for a specific thickness range. The system determines which segment applies based on the measured thickness value and uses the corresponding function for calculation. This approach maintains reasonable model complexity by limiting each individual function to a specific range where it performs well, while achieving high overall precision through the combination of multiple specialized functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration model dynamically selects which mathematical function to apply based on the measured thickness value. The system transitions between different calibration functions as the thickness varies, allowing the model to adapt to different measurement conditions. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by maintaining simplicity within each local range while achieving high precision across the entire thickness spectrum through adaptive function selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If eddy current sensors are used for thickness measurement, then measurement speed is fast, but measurement precision deteriorates due to non-monotonic functions and high error rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoidthickness measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the eddy current sensor output parameters (which exhibit non-monotonic behavior) into a different parameter space through the segmented calibration functions. By applying range-specific mathematical transformations, the system converts the complex non-monotonic impedance data into accurate thickness values. This parameter transformation maintains the fast measurement speed of eddy current sensing while eliminating the precision problems caused by non-monotonic response characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate and reliable thickness measurements, minimizing error across a broad range of conductive layer thicknesses, enabling precise control in CMP processes and reducing the need for frequent recalibration.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a magnetic flux density change when the conductive layer on the workpiece is in a magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

when the conductive layer on the workpiece is in a magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS9007059B2Methods for monitoring thickness of a conductive layer
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS INC
  • US9007059B2 patent drawing
  • US9007059B2 patent drawing
  • US9007059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses for calibrating eddy current sensors. A calibration curve is formed relating thickness of a conductive layer in a magnetic field to a value measured by the eddy current sensors or a value derived from such measurement, such as argument of impedance. The calibration curve may be an analytic function having infinite number terms, such as trigonometric, hyperbolic, and logarithmic, or a continuous plurality of functions, such as lines. High accuracy allows the omission of optical sensors, and use of eddy current sensors for endpoint detection, transition call detection, and closed loop control in which a process parameter is changed based on the measured magnetic flux density change in one or more processing zones.