Edge Cleaning Brush Gearing to Prevent Debris Scattering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional edge cleaning brushes on autonomous floor cleaners often have tip velocities that are too high, causing debris to be flung outward rather than collected, and the slower inner areas may not effectively clean surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The edge cleaning brush design incorporates multiple cleaning implements with a planetary gear system, allowing one implement to rotate at a lower speed than another, optimizing tip velocities to prevent debris scattering while ensuring effective sweeping and cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the edge cleaning brush rotates at high speed to improve cleaning coverage, then the cleaning area increases, but debris is flung outward instead of being collected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning coverageVSAvoiddebris scattering
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The edge cleaning brush is divided into multiple cleaning implements (inner blades and outer blades) that can rotate at different speeds. The inner blades rotate faster to sweep debris inward, while the outer blades rotate slower to prevent debris from being flung outward, thus segmenting the cleaning function to resolve the contradiction between coverage and debris control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the cleaning brush have different rotational velocities tailored to their specific functions. The inner area requires higher speed for effective sweeping, while the outer area requires lower speed to contain debris. This local differentiation of rotational speed allows each zone to perform its optimal cleaning function without causing harmful debris scattering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the edge cleaning brush rotates at low speed to prevent debris scattering, then debris control improves, but the inner areas fail to effectively clean surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris scatteringVSAvoidcleaning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning brush is segmented into inner and outer cleaning implements with different rotational speeds. The inner blades rotate faster to ensure effective surface cleaning in high-traffic areas, while the outer blades rotate slower to prevent debris scattering, thus maintaining both cleaning reliability and debris control through functional segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each zone of the cleaning brush is assigned a specific rotational velocity appropriate to its cleaning requirements. The inner area receives higher rotational speed for thorough cleaning, while the outer area operates at lower speed for debris containment. This local quality differentiation ensures both regions perform their functions effectively without compromising overall cleaning reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single rotational speed is used for the entire cleaning brush to simplify the drive system, then device complexity decreases, but neither inner nor outer areas can optimize their cleaning performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive system complexityVSAvoidcleaning performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented to provide different rotational speeds to inner and outer cleaning implements. This segmentation enables optimized cleaning performance in different zones while using a practical mechanical implementation through gear systems with different ratios, balancing device complexity with enhanced cleaning productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotational velocity parameter is changed across different parts of the cleaning brush. By varying the rotational speed parameter from inner to outer blades, the system optimizes cleaning performance for different zones. This parameter differentiation is achieved through gear systems with different ratios, maintaining manageable device complexity while significantly improving overall cleaning productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively collects debris without scattering it, enhancing the cleaning performance by using different rotational velocities for inner and outer blades, ensuring both efficient sweeping and thorough surface contact.

Implementation Method 1

The edge cleaning brush design incorporates multiple cleaning implements with a planetary gear system, allowing one implement to rotate at a lower speed than another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlanetary gear mechanism: Epicyclic Gearing

Data Source

PatentUS11589670B2Edge cleaning brushes for floor cleaner
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 BISSELL INC
  • US11589670B2 patent drawing
  • US11589670B2 patent drawing
  • US11589670B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A floor cleaner can include a housing adapted for movement over a surface to be cleaned and at least one edge cleaning brush provided on the housing. The edge cleaning brush includes multiple cleaning implements which rotate at different velocities. A gear system, such as a planetary gear system, can drive one cleaning implement at a lower speed than another cleaning implement.