Edge-Colored Dynamical Ising Solver for Sparse Spin Glasses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in efficiently solving sparse Ising problems, particularly spin glass-like problems with disorder and frustration, leading to inefficiencies in finding high-quality solutions.

Innovation Solution

A dynamical Ising solver system employing collective switched motion (Cosm) with edge coloring and dual phase window shifts to update continuous variables, facilitating large spin clusters that drive the system toward low-energy configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional solvers are used to solve sparse Ising problems, then the problem can be solved, but the solution quality is insufficient and computational efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution qualityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic step size adjustment where the step size is initially large to enable rapid exploration of the solution space and then progressively reduced to refine the solution. This dynamic adaptation allows the solver to achieve both high solution quality and computational efficiency by avoiding premature convergence while preventing excessive computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of step size from a fixed value to a dynamically adjusted value that depends on the current state of the optimization process. By monitoring progress and adjusting the step size accordingly, the system achieves better solution quality without proportionally increasing computational time, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If larger step sizes are used to improve computational efficiency, then the solver converges faster, but the solution quality deteriorates due to overshooting optimal configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence speedVSAvoidsolution quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic step size strategy where large step sizes are used initially to achieve fast convergence and explore the solution space rapidly, then the step size is progressively reduced to enable precise refinement near optimal configurations. This temporal variation in step size allows the system to achieve both high productivity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic monitoring and adjustment of the step size based on the optimization progress. By periodically evaluating whether the current step size is appropriate for the current state of the solution, the system can switch between exploration (larger steps) and exploitation (smaller steps) phases, achieving both fast convergence and high solution quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If the step size is reduced to improve solution quality, then the solver achieves higher precision, but the computational time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution qualityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a dynamic step size schedule that adapts to the optimization progress. By using large step sizes during early stages when the solution is far from optimal and only reducing the step size when necessary for fine-tuning, the system achieves high solution quality without the computational time penalty of consistently using small step sizes throughout the entire optimization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary exploration with large step sizes to quickly reach a reasonable solution before switching to fine-tuning mode. This preliminary action eliminates the need for excessively long fine-tuning phases, as the bulk of the optimization work is completed in the exploration phase, thus reducing overall computational time while maintaining high solution quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250258886A1Systems and method for solving spin glasses and other sparse ising problems
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US20250258886A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258886A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258886A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamical Ising solver system can efficiently generate high-quality solutions to binary optimization problems. A problem description is received indicating a graph of binary variables and weighted couplings between them. An edge coloring of the graph is used to select sub-neighborhoods of a relaxed problem involving continuous variables, where variables connected to edges of a given edge color are updated by adjusting continuous variables on edges of that color toward or away from each other based on a step size and their coupling. Dual phase window shifts are employed to stochastically alter the continuous variables to avoid the system being trapped in saddle points or local minima. The final values of the continuous variables are used to determine binary values of a solution for the binary optimization problem.