Edge Computing Request Processing Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multi-access edge computing (MEC) systems lack dynamic decision-making capabilities for optimizing processing of application requests with low latency, failing to consider user device processing capabilities and network congestion effectively.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves using machine learning (ML) methods to predict processing modes for application requests, which can include local processing, edge processing, or hybrid processing. This approach considers parameters such as signal strength, network congestion, and user preferences to decide the optimal processing mode and derive a cost function for resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If application requests are processed using traditional MEC systems, then processing can be performed at the edge, but the system lacks dynamic decision-making capabilities and cannot effectively optimize processing with low latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing latencyVSAvoiddynamic decision-making capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects processing modes (local processing, edge processing, or hybrid processing) based on real-time conditions such as network congestion, signal strength, and device battery level. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by enabling the system to switch between static processing configurations to optimize for low latency when conditions permit, while maintaining adaptability when conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor network conditions, device state, and processing performance. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from past decisions and adjust processing mode selections in real-time, providing both the low latency performance and dynamic adaptability required to resolve the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the system uses machine learning methods to predict processing modes and derive cost functions, then processing optimization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the processing decision into distinct components: local processing capabilities assessment, edge processing evaluation, hybrid processing options, and cost function derivation. This segmentation allows the complex ML-based optimization to be broken down into manageable modules, improving productivity while controlling system complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating cost functions and processing mode predictions based on current conditions before actual request processing. This preliminary ML-based analysis enables optimized processing decisions to be made quickly during request handling, improving productivity without adding complexity during the critical processing path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the system dynamically selects processing modes based on real-time conditions, then resource utilization is improved, but the decision-making process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoiddecision-making complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters such as network congestion level, signal strength, and battery status to determine optimal processing modes. By monitoring and responding to parameter changes in the environment rather than hardcoding complex decision logic, the system achieves improved resource utilization through dynamic adaptation while keeping the decision-making framework relatively simple and parameter-driven.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12267707B2Methods and systems for optimizing processing of application requests
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12267707B2 patent drawing
  • US12267707B2 patent drawing
  • US12267707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a communication method and system for converging a 5th-Generation (5G) communication system for supporting higher data rates beyond a 4th-Generation (4G) system with a technology for Internet of Things (IoT). The present disclosure may be applied to intelligent services based on the 5G communication technology and the IoT-related technology, such as smart home, smart building, smart city, smart car, connected car, health care, digital education, smart retail, security and safety services. The present disclosure relates to a method for optimizing processing of application requests.