Edge DNN Workload Scheduling for Multi-Camera Core Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing edge devices lack efficient scheduling frameworks to support multiple camera streams and DNN models, leading to suboptimal resource utilization and performance degradation, especially when handling diverse DNN architectures and frameworks.

Innovation Solution

A framework that leverages insights about DNN structures to efficiently schedule workloads, using a profiler to estimate resource requirements and an allocator to assign cores and parameters, ensuring no DNN workload is starved, even with increasing workloads, and supporting various DNN models and camera streams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple DNN models are run on multiple camera streams simultaneously, then the system functionality and versatility are improved, but the resource consumption and processing complexity increase beyond the capacity of typical edge devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple camera streams and DNN modelsVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments DNN workloads into multiple independent tasks that can be scheduled and executed on different CPU cores simultaneously. Each camera stream and DNN model combination is treated as a separate schedulable task, allowing the system to manage complexity through modular task decomposition rather than monolithic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal scheduling framework that can handle diverse DNN models (e.g., YOLO, SSD, Faster R-CNN) and multiple camera streams through a single multi-core processor. The framework provides multi-functionality by supporting various DNN architectures and frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, Caffe) without requiring dedicated hardware for each model type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If dedicated cores are assigned to each DNN on each camera stream, then the processing speed and frame rate are improved, but the hardware resources required exceed what is available on typical edge devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rateVSAvoidhardware resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic core allocation where CPU cores are not permanently dedicated to specific DNN tasks but are dynamically assigned based on current workload demands. The scheduler monitors task priorities, deadlines, and resource availability to flexibly allocate cores across multiple DNN inference tasks, enabling high frame rates without requiring a dedicated core for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple DNN inference tasks onto shared CPU cores through efficient scheduling. Multiple camera streams and DNN models share the same hardware resources (GPUs and CPUs) by time-multiplexing and parallel processing across available cores, reducing the total hardware footprint while maintaining acceptable performance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of time

If compute-heavy DNN workloads are run locally on edge devices, then latency is reduced and cloud bandwidth consumption decreases, but the limited GPU and CPU resources of edge devices become insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidprocessing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuous processing of multiple camera streams by implementing a scheduling framework that maintains steady throughput across all active DNN tasks. The scheduler prevents idle time between inference operations and ensures that CPU cores are continuously utilized for productive DNN processing, maximizing the limited edge device resources to achieve acceptable latency without overwhelming the processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3759652B1Deep neural network workload scheduling
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3759652B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3759652B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3759652B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-executable instructions for scheduling neural network workloads on an edge device. A performance model for each neural network model is received. Parameters for each neural network workload is determined based on an associated performance model. Processing core assignments are determined from a plurality of processing cores for each neural network workload based on the corresponding performance model and processing core utilization. Image streams are received and associated with a neural network workload. Each neural network workload is scheduled to run on the processing cores based on the processing core assignments.