Edge Inference System for Real-Time Video Augmentation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current technologies face challenges in providing real-time computer-aided video augmentation for live input streams, particularly in healthcare and industrial applications, due to limitations in latency, object detection accuracy, and workflow automation.
Innovation Solution
A networked system comprising an endpoint system, an edge inference system, and a backend system that uses AI/ML models for real-time object detection and augmentation, incorporating natural language processing for voice transcription and workflow automation, with dynamic resource orchestration and multi-model inference capabilities.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If real-time object detection and augmentation is implemented using AI/ML models, then object detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity and computational resource requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the video processing workflow into distinct functional modules: object detection service, natural language processing service, video augmentation service, and workflow automation service. Each service operates independently but coordinates through standardized interfaces, allowing the complex AI/ML processing to be broken down into manageable components that can be developed, deployed, and scaled separately while maintaining high detection accuracy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary orchestration layer that coordinates between the endpoint system, edge inference system, and backend services. This intermediary manages the complex interactions between multiple AI/ML models and services, handling service registration, discovery, and coordination without requiring the endpoint system to directly manage the complexity of multiple AI/ML components.
2Measurement precision
If multiple AI/ML models are deployed for comprehensive video analysis, then detection capability is improved, but processing time and latency increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing video frames and preparing multiple AI/ML models for parallel execution. The endpoint system pre-parses incoming video streams and identifies regions of interest before passing them to the edge inference system, where multiple models are already prepared and can process different aspects of the same frame simultaneously, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive detection capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements continuous processing pipelines where video frames are processed through multiple AI/ML models in an overlapping manner. While one model processes a frame, another model is already preparing to process the next frame, ensuring continuous useful action without idle time. The system maintains multiple inference pipelines running concurrently to eliminate processing gaps and reduce overall latency.
3Power
If cloud-based video processing is used, then computational power is improved, but network latency and bandwidth requirements worsen
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies local quality by deploying different processing capabilities at different locations in the network hierarchy. The endpoint system performs local pre-processing and basic analysis, the edge inference system handles real-time object detection and augmentation with moderate computational requirements, and the backend cloud system provides heavy computational power for model training and complex analysis. This distribution ensures that time-sensitive operations occur locally with minimal network latency while still utilizing cloud computational power where appropriate.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a spatial dimension to the processing architecture by implementing a multi-tiered system (endpoint-edge-cloud) that processes video data at different network locations. This dimensional approach allows the system to balance computational power and latency by placing appropriate processing capabilities at each tier, rather than concentrating all processing in a single cloud location, thus reducing network latency for time-sensitive operations while maintaining access to cloud computational resources.
4Productivity
If automated workflow orchestration is implemented, then workflow efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The workflow automation service implements self-service capabilities by automatically discovering available services, registering new services, and orchestrating processing pipelines without requiring manual configuration. The system autonomously manages service lifecycles including deployment, monitoring, and scaling, reducing the operational complexity burden on users while maintaining high workflow efficiency through automated decision-making and resource allocation.
Data Source
AI summary
A networked system for real-time computer-aided augmentation of a live input video stream includes an endpoint system configured and operative to handle the live input video stream and a live augmented video stream and to provide service access to a video augmentation service for the computer-aided augmentation of the live input video stream. The system further includes a backend system providing service orchestration to orchestrate use and operation of the video augmentation service, and an edge inference system coupled to the endpoint system and to the backend system, the edge inference system being configured and co-operative with the endpoint system to provide the video augmentation service on the live input video stream and thereby generate the live augmented video stream, based on the service orchestration by the backend system.


