Edge IP Spoofing Detection With Dynamic Ingress Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing IP spoofing prevention methods are inadequate as they are often reactive, consume excessive computational resources, fail to distinguish between legitimate and malicious traffic, and do not account for the duration of cyberattacks, leading to inefficient bandwidth usage and resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing automated logic systems on edge devices to evaluate network traffic for suspicious behavior, apply filters at ingress points, and dynamically manage filtering based on threat levels, thereby enhancing detection and reducing computational and bandwidth costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated logic systems evaluate all network traffic to identify spoofing, then detection accuracy improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing automated logic systems at network ingress points to evaluate traffic before it reaches internal systems. This early detection and filtering approach prevents malicious traffic from consuming computational resources deeper in the network, thereby maintaining high detection accuracy while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If security filters are applied continuously to block malicious traffic, then security reliability improves, but bandwidth utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidbandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic filtering by continuously monitoring network traffic patterns and adjusting filter rules in real-time. The system applies filters selectively based on detected threats rather than continuously, allowing legitimate traffic to flow unimpeded while blocking malicious traffic. This dynamic approach maintains security reliability while optimizing bandwidth utilization by avoiding unnecessary filtering of legitimate traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If security features are applied after traffic is received, then device complexity is reduced, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by deploying automated logic systems at network ingress points to evaluate and filter traffic before it reaches internal systems. This proactive approach reduces response time by detecting and blocking malicious traffic at the network perimeter, while the modular architecture of the automated logic systems keeps device complexity manageable through standardized evaluation rules and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12603917B2Systems and methods for IP spoofing security
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 CENTURYLINK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
  • US12603917B2 patent drawing
  • US12603917B2 patent drawing
  • US12603917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of the present disclosure describe systems and methods for providing security against IP spoofing. In aspects, network traffic associated with one or more data requests may be received by a device in a computing environment. The network traffic may be evaluated using one or more automated logic systems or algorithms to identify suspicious or malicious behavior. The automated logic systems or algorithms may implement one or more analyses, such as asymmetric routing analysis, hardware device analysis, user and/or network behavior analysis, etc. Upon identifying suspicious or malicious behavior, the automated logic systems or algorithms may apply a filter to one or more computing devices. For example, a filter for blocking network traffic associated with the suspicious or malicious behavior may be applied to a computing device that is in close geographic and/or logical proximity to an attacking computing device.