Edge Pixel Correction for Printed Material Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image inspection techniques for printed materials often fail to accurately detect defects near image edges due to misalignment and noise, leading to potential overdetection or underdetection of image defects, especially in areas with steep luminance changes.

Innovation Solution

An inspection apparatus that extracts and corrects pixel values in predetermined edge areas of both the inspection and reference images, using smoothing and noise appending processes to improve alignment and reduce false defect detection, allowing for high-accuracy detection of blots on printed materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the threshold value is corrected based on pixel densities in edge areas to suppress overdetection, then false defect detection is reduced, but real image defects in dark portions near edges may be overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddefect detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple areas: edge areas where luminance changes steeply and non-edge areas. Different processing is applied to each segment - threshold correction is applied selectively to edge areas to suppress false detection, while non-edge areas maintain standard detection sensitivity to ensure real defects are not missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different threshold correction strategies are applied to different regions of the image. In edge areas with steep luminance changes, the threshold is corrected to reduce false positives. In non-edge areas, the original threshold is maintained to ensure sensitive detection of actual defects. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between suppressing false detection and maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If alignment processing is performed to reduce misalignment between reference and scanned images, then overall alignment accuracy is improved, but residual misalignment in edge areas with steep luminance changes causes large luminance differences that are detected as defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidluminance difference due to misalignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies edge areas with steep luminance changes as problematic regions where residual misalignment causes large luminance differences. By applying threshold correction specifically to these local edge areas while maintaining standard processing elsewhere, the system accounts for the harmful effect of misalignment in these specific regions without compromising overall alignment accuracy or detection sensitivity in non-edge areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240013372A1Inspection apparatus, inspection method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 CANON KK
  • US20240013372A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013372A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013372A1 patent drawing

AI summary

From one of an inspection image of a printed material and a reference image, a predetermined area including an edge is extracted and a pixel value of a pixel is corrected, which configures the predetermined area in the inspection image or the reference image, from which the predetermined area has been extracted, and a blot on the printed material is detected by using collation results of the corrected inspection image and the reference image and a threshold value, or by using collation results of the inspection image and the corrected reference image and the threshold value.