Edge Plate Voltage Control for Charged Particle Beam Inspection Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Charged particle beam inspection systems face image variation issues near substrate edges due to non-axial symmetrical electric field distributions, which cause image shifting, distortion, and defocus, and existing solutions like enlarged gaps with biased rings are impractical to implement due to control and insulation challenges.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that capture central and peripheral images of a substrate using a charged particle beam, apply a voltage between the substrate and an edge plate determined by the image differences, and use an edge effect eliminator to adjust the bias voltage and equipotential lines to minimize edge field effects, ensuring a uniform potential distribution and accurate imaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a bias voltage is applied between the substrate and objective lens to perform low energy inspection, then the charged particle beam can be focused properly, but the non-axial symmetrical electric field distribution at substrate edges causes image shifting, distortion and defocus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection image accuracyVSAvoidedge field effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

An edge plate is introduced as an intermediary component between the substrate and the inspection system. The edge plate is positioned close to the substrate edge and has a controllable potential that can be adjusted to compensate for the non-axial symmetrical electric field distribution, thereby reducing image shifting, distortion and defocus at substrate edges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an insert ring with voltage is used to reduce edge effect by enlarging the gap, then the edge field effect can be reduced, but the height, shape and flatness control becomes too difficult and additional isolation is needed which may induce more severe problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge field effectVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the edge field effect compensation function from the complex insert ring structure and implements it through a simpler edge plate positioned close to the substrate edge. This eliminates the need for difficult-to-control height, shape and flatness specifications while avoiding the insulation problems associated with enlarged gaps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from mechanical dimensions (height, shape, flatness of insert ring) to electrical parameter (potential of edge plate). By controlling the potential of the edge plate, the system achieves edge field effect reduction without the manufacturing and assembly difficulties of the insert ring approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the gap between substrate and chuck is increased to accommodate position accuracy tolerance, then assembly tolerance can be tolerated, but the non-uniform gap creates non-axial symmetrical electric field that distorts the primary beam

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly toleranceVSAvoidbeam positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The edge plate acts as an intermediary that compensates for the non-uniform gap between substrate and chuck. By positioning the edge plate close to the substrate edge and controlling its potential, the system maintains beam positioning accuracy despite the presence of assembly tolerance in the gap

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces edge effects by compensating for image shifts, distortions, and defocus, providing accurate and non-defocused inspection images by planarizing the potential distribution near the substrate edge, thus enhancing the precision of defect inspection in semiconductor fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

The imaging practice is irradiating a charged particle beam 102, to the surface of the substrate 160 and detecting the backscattered and secondary charged particles emanating from the surface of substrate 160

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle beam interaction: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

the objective lens 130 will focus the primary charged particle beam 102 on to the surface of the substrate 160

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic lens focusing: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

a bias voltage is applied between the plate holding the substrate 160 and the objective lens 130. Since the substrate is not located in an area free of electrical fields, its material, shape and bias voltage may change the spatial electrical field distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS8294094B1Method and apparatus for reducing substrate edge effect during inspection
Publication Date: 2012.10.23 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US8294094B1 patent drawing
  • US8294094B1 patent drawing
  • US8294094B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method are introduced in this invention to reduce the edge effect of a substrate that causes image variation or distortion due to applied substrate bias. An edge plate with an edge effect eliminator are provided such that substrate is inspected by a charged particle beam can capture images without distortion at substrate edge.