Edge Quantum Computing Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number and complexity of computations in IoT devices, smart transportation, and smart cities lead to significant processing time and latency when using classical processing at central clouds, degrading application performance.

Innovation Solution

Distributing application processing by network location and type, enabling quantum processing at edge nodes, where a machine learning component determines whether to process applications at a central cloud or edge node and whether to use classical or quantum computing, thereby reducing latency and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If classical processing at central cloud is used, then processing capacity is sufficient, but latency increases and application performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidprocessing architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized cloud processing architecture into distributed edge computing nodes positioned geographically closer to end devices. This segmentation reduces the distance data must travel, thereby reducing latency while distributing computational tasks across multiple edge nodes rather than a single centralized cloud, balancing processing capacity with response time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new spatial dimension to the processing architecture by deploying edge computing nodes at intermediate locations between central cloud and end devices. This creates a multi-layered processing hierarchy (central cloud → edge nodes → end devices) that adds geographical proximity as a new dimension for optimizing latency without sacrificing processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If quantum processing at edge node is used, then computational accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational accuracyVSAvoidquantum computing device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies quantum processing selectively at specific edge nodes rather than universally across all processing locations. The machine learning component determines which applications require quantum processing based on their specific computational requirements, applying quantum resources locally only where needed to achieve higher accuracy while avoiding unnecessary quantum processing for simpler tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial quantum processing by using quantum computing resources for only the portions of applications that benefit from quantum algorithms, while classical processing handles other portions. This partial application of quantum processing achieves accuracy improvements for critical computations without requiring full quantum processing for all applications, thereby managing complexity more effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If machine learning component determines processing location and type, then resource allocation optimizes, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidmachine learning component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning component operates autonomously at each edge node, making independent decisions about processing location and type based on local conditions and application requirements. This self-service capability allows the system to dynamically optimize resource allocation without requiring centralized control for every decision, improving efficiency while distributing the computational overhead of the machine learning component across multiple edge nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11509599B1Edge quantum computing
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US11509599B1 patent drawing
  • US11509599B1 patent drawing
  • US11509599B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for enabling quantum computing at an edge node of a network. For example, a machine learning component residing on each of a plurality of edge nodes of the network may be implemented to distribute application processing by network location and processing type, including distribution among classical processing at a central cloud, classical processing at an edge node, and quantum processing at a quantum edge node including a quantum computing device. By distributing certain applications, such as latency-sensitive applications of a higher order of complexity, to an edge node, and particularly a quantum edge node, latency may be reduced and complex application code may be processed more quicky using quantum computations. For applications to be processed using quantum processing, the machine learning component may further identify qubits for the quantum processing and define containers based on the qubits for deployment by the quantum computing device.