Edge Computing Security Strategy Selection via Quantitative Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in edge computing systems is to quantify security risks and threats for terminals and data, and select appropriate security access strategies to optimize system security performance, given the complexity of heterogeneous terminals and varying application requirements.

Innovation Solution

The method employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and machine learning algorithms to quantify security risks and select security access strategies for edge computing systems, using a BP neural network to optimize security performance by evaluating and combining security strategies based on objective quantitative standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple security strategies are implemented to protect heterogeneous terminals and data in edge computing systems, then system security performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem security performanceVSAvoidsecurity strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the security strategy selection problem into a parameter optimization problem by quantifying security risks and strategy effectiveness using numerical parameters. The AHP method converts qualitative security assessments into quantitative parameters, enabling systematic comparison and selection of security strategies based on calculated risk scores rather than complex manual evaluation of multiple strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an automated security strategy selection system that autonomously evaluates security risks and selects appropriate strategies without requiring manual intervention. The system uses AHP-based quantitative assessment and machine learning algorithms to automatically determine the most effective security strategies for different terminals and data, reducing the operational complexity for users while maintaining high security performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If AHP and machine learning algorithms are used to quantify security risks and select strategies, then security performance optimization is achieved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity performanceVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates security risk parameters and strategy effectiveness scores using AHP methodology before actual security incidents occur. By establishing the evaluation framework and quantifying security parameters in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during real-time security decision-making, as the complex AHP calculations are performed beforehand rather than during critical security events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a tiered security assessment approach that applies full AHP-based quantitative analysis only when necessary, rather than continuously evaluating all security parameters. The system uses machine learning to identify when simplified assessment methods are sufficient, reserving the more computationally intensive AHP calculations for high-risk scenarios, thus optimizing the balance between security performance and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11374969B2Quantitative selection of secure access policies for edge computing system
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 UNIV OF ELECTRONICS SCI & TECH OF CHINA
  • US11374969B2 patent drawing
  • US11374969B2 patent drawing
  • US11374969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantitative method for the security access strategy selection of the edge computing terminals includes the following steps: S1. Quantifying and ranking the security risks according to the terminals and data application requirements under the edge computing system. S1. Quantifying and ranking the security risks according to the terminals and data application requirements under the edge computing system. S2. Calculating the security quantification value of terminal and data application. S3. Giving the weight coefficients for the security risk protection of the security access strategies for the terminal and data in the edge computing side. S4. Give the corresponding value of each security strategy to the corresponding terminal and data security protection. S5. Select the corresponding algorithm according to the data set in S4 to select the security strategies.