Edge Application Server Switching for UE Service Continuity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In edge computing environments, there is a need to determine when and to which edge application server (EAS) a user equipment (UE) should switch due to factors such as congestion, outages, or changes in application execution, ensuring seamless service continuity.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining when a first EAS is no longer suitable for a UE and selecting a second EAS, involving network components like the Application Function (AF), Session Management Function (SMF), and User Plane Function (UPF) to manage PDU sessions and update UE configuration to switch to the new EAS, with UE feedback on link quality triggering relocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE remains connected to the first EAS, then the connection is maintained with existing EAS, but the service quality deteriorates when EAS becomes congested or experiences outage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidEAS suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The network component proactively monitors EAS status parameters (congestion level, outage condition, link quality) and initiates EAS selection and switching procedures before the UE experiences service degradation. This preliminary detection and action prevents service quality deterioration rather than reacting after problems occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors EAS status parameters and uses this feedback to dynamically determine when EAS switching is needed. The monitoring of congestion levels, outage conditions, and link quality provides real-time feedback that triggers appropriate switching actions to maintain service reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the UE switches to a different EAS, then service continuity is maintained, but the complexity of determining when and where to switch increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidEAS selection logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A network component acts as an intermediary between the UE and multiple EASs, centralizing the complex EAS selection logic and status monitoring in the network rather than requiring the UE to independently evaluate multiple EAS options. This mediator handles the complexity of determining when and where to switch based on monitored parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the network monitors EAS status continuously, then timely switching can be detected, but the monitoring overhead and network resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimely EAS switchingVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the network component performs periodic status checks of EAS parameters (congestion level, outage condition, link quality). This periodic action provides sufficient timing information for switching decisions while significantly reducing the overhead and resource consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12563452B2Selection of edge application server
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 APPLE INC
  • US12563452B2 patent drawing
  • US12563452B2 patent drawing
  • US12563452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and devices for selecting an edge application server (EAS) to service a user equipment (UE). One exemplary method incudes determining that a current protocol data unit (PDU) session of an application being executed by a UE is being serviced by a first EAS, determining that the first EAS is no longer suitable to service the application, selecting a second EAS to service the application and instructing the UE to use the second EAS for future PDU sessions for the application.