EDI Water Treatment Using Iodine Oxidation for Slime Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing water treatment methods using electrodeionization (EDI) devices face issues with slime generation leading to increased differential pressure and decreased water quality due to the use of oxidizing agents, which also deteriorate the ion exchange resin and membranes, necessitating lengthy cleaning processes that disrupt operation.

Innovation Solution

The use of an iodine-containing oxidizing agent as a slime inhibitor in the EDI device, combined with an anion exchanger, allows continuous operation without deteriorating water quality or increasing pressure, by adding the agent to the water before treatment and ensuring at least part of the ion exchanger is an anion exchanger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If oxidizing agents (hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide, ozone) are added to water to suppress slime, then slime growth is inhibited, but the ion exchange resin and membrane are deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslime suppressionVSAvoidion exchange resin durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameter by using iodine-containing oxidizing agents instead of conventional oxidizing agents (hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide, ozone). This parameter substitution maintains the oxidizing capability needed for slime suppression while reducing the harmful impact on ion exchange resin and membrane durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional oxidizing agents are used for slime removal, then slime is suppressed, but voltage application must be stopped or weakened, preventing deionization treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslime controlVSAvoiddeionization treatment continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes conventional oxidizing agents with iodine-containing oxidizing agents, changing the chemical parameter to enable both slime control and continuous deionization treatment without requiring voltage interruption or reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If chemical cleaning is performed to remove slime, then slime is removed from the device, but the cleaning process takes several days and the device cannot be used during cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslime removalVSAvoiddevice downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service approach where iodine-containing oxidizing agents are continuously added to the water supply, enabling the EDI device to suppress and remove slime during normal operation without requiring separate cleaning cycles that would cause device downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If oxidizing agents are used to prevent slime blockage, then water flow is maintained, but the oxidizing agents deteriorate the ion exchange components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater flow maintenanceVSAvoidion exchange component integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameter by using iodine-containing oxidizing agents instead of conventional oxidizing agents, maintaining the water flow benefits while preserving ion exchange component integrity through reduced chemical deterioration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains high water quality and prevents pressure increases in the EDI device, while effectively inhibiting slime growth and preserving the integrity of the ion exchange components.

Implementation Method 1

The slime inhibitor is composed of, for example, hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, or the like which have a bactericidal action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

at least the deionization chamber is filled with an ion exchanger such as an ion exchange resin, and, by applying a DC voltage between the anode and the cathode while passing the water to be treated through the deionization chamber, treated water from which ion components have been removed flows out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 3

The EDI device is a device in which electrophoresis and electrodialysis are combined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrophoresis: Electrophoresis

Implementation Method 4

The EDI device is a device in which electrophoresis and electrodialysis are combined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodialysis:

Data Source

PatentUS20250346512A1Water treatment method, water treatment apparatus, slime inhibitor, and cleaning method
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 ORGANO CORP
  • US20250346512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A water treatment method includes: adding a chemical to water to be treated to obtain water to be treated which contains iodine and is provided with oxidizing power; and supplying the water to be treated that has undergone the chemical addition to an electrodeionization device (EDI device) to treat the water to be treated in the EDI device. At least a part of an ion exchanger filled in a deionization chamber of the EDI device is an anion exchanger.