EDM Wire Electrode Gap Control via Electrical Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wire electrode machining (WEM) techniques face challenges in achieving high precision and speed due to mechanical inertia, which leads to defects such as ridges and incomplete material removal, especially during finishing passes, as the regulation of the machining gap is delayed in response to rapid changes in material conditions.

Innovation Solution

An internal regulation loop that rapidly adjusts the pause time between erosive discharges based on real-time measurements of the machining gap width, allowing for instantaneous correction of gap deviations without moving the machine axes, combined with an external mechanical loop to synchronize axis movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the machining gap is regulated by moving the machine axes, then the gap width can be adjusted, but the response is delayed due to mechanical inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining gap regulation precisionVSAvoidresponse speed of gap regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical axis movement system with an electrical control system that adjusts the pause time between discharges. This substitution eliminates mechanical inertia delays, allowing instantaneous regulation of machining power and rapid correction of gap deviations without physical movement of machine components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from mechanical position to electrical timing (pause time between discharges). By measuring the waiting time and adjusting the pause time parameter, the system rapidly modifies machining power to counteract gap variations, achieving fast response without mechanical movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the pause time between discharges is extended to allow axis movement, then mechanical regulation can occur, but machining power fluctuates and precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical regulation capabilityVSAvoidmachining power stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop that measures the waiting time (representative of machining gap width) and uses this information to adjust the pause time between discharges. This closed-loop control maintains constant machining power by compensating for gap variations in real-time, eliminating the power fluctuations that occur during mechanical regulation periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent takes preliminary action by measuring the waiting time before each discharge and pre-calculating the appropriate pause time adjustment. This anticipatory control prevents machining power deviations rather than reacting to them after they occur, maintaining stability throughout the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If the wire tension is increased to reduce oscillations, then surface ridges decrease, but the wire becomes more susceptible to breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidwire breakage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control approach from mechanical (wire tension) to temporal (pause time between discharges). By adjusting the timing parameter rather than the mechanical tension, the system achieves wire balance and reduces oscillations without increasing breakage risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical wire tension adjustment with electrical timing control. This substitution allows regulation of wire behavior through pause time modification, achieving oscillation control and surface quality improvement without the adverse effects of increased mechanical tension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple finishing passes are performed to correct geometric defects, then precision improves, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidmachining speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces slow mechanical multi-pass finishing with fast electrical control that achieves precision in a single pass. By controlling pause time based on real-time waiting time measurement, the system corrects geometric defects immediately without requiring repeated machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary correction of geometric defects by measuring waiting time variations and adjusting pause time accordingly during the same pass. This anticipatory correction eliminates the need for subsequent finishing passes, achieving high precision in one operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high-speed, high-precision machining by maintaining constant machining power and adjusting the machining gap width rapidly, reducing defects and improving the ability to correct geometric imperfections in a single pass.

Implementation Method 1

a workpiece is machined by means of a tool in the form of an electrode wire along a front of material which recedes in front of the tool under the effect of discharges erosive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical breakdown: Electric Spark

Implementation Method 2

the wire machines laterally in order to correct geometric inaccuracies resulting from a roughing pass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal erosion: Ablation

Implementation Method 3

forces caused by the thrust of erosive discharges, by the flow of the dielectric fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2180968B1Electon discharge machining method and device
Publication Date: 2019.05.29 AGIE CHARMILLES SA
  • EP2180968B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2180968B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP2180968B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Electron discharge machining method and device whereby a work piece (2) is machined using a tool (1) along a machining front which retreats ahead of the tool under the effect of spark erosion. The work piece and the tool are separated from one another by a machining gap. A cyclic sequence of voltage pulses (Uign) is applied between the tool and the work piece in order to generate the sparks used for erosion. The tool is moved along a number of axes (3, 4, 15) relative to the work piece. The sparks used for erosion are separated from one another by pauses (TS). A parameter (TDmoy) representative of the width of the machining gap is measured (7, 10, 11 ) in real time. The method and the device are characterized in that the variations in the width of the machining gap are countered by means of a permanent control loop (5, 7, 10, 11, 16, 20, 9, 6, 5) which governs the mean machining power (Pmoy) in accordance with a continuous law which makes the pause (TS) dependent on the parameter that represents the width of the machining gap (TDmoy). Said internal loop does not cause any change in axis. By virtue of these features, an electron discharge machining method and device are obtained that have very rapid, almost instant, control, thus eliminating the defects caused by mechanical inertia.