EDMG Sync Field for WLAN Sensing Timing Alignment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In parallel coordinated monostatic WLAN sensing measurements, the timing alignment of monostatic PPDU transmissions from different sensing responders is challenging due to potential differences in modulation and coding schemes (MCS) used between responders, leading to interference and reduced sensing accuracy.
Innovation Solution
The introduction of a Sync field in the EDMG multi-static sensing PPDU, which is directionally transmitted to each sensing responder, synchronizes their transmission of monostatic PPDUs, ensuring timely alignment and resolving the timing issue.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If different MCS are used by different sensing responders, then adaptability to various channel conditions is improved, but timing alignment deteriorates leading to interference and reduced sensing accuracy
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a Sync field as an intermediary element within the EDMG multi-static sensing PPDU. This Sync field acts as a mediator that carries timing synchronization information to multiple sensing responders, enabling them to align their monostatic PPDU transmissions despite using different MCS. The Sync field receives timing information from the initiator and distributes synchronized timing references to all responders, thus resolving the timing misalignment caused by MCS diversity while preserving adaptability to different channel conditions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements preliminary timing synchronization by transmitting the Sync field before the monostatic PPDU transmissions. The Sync field is sent in advance to provide timing references to all sensing responders, allowing them to pre-align their transmission timing. This preliminary action ensures that even though responders use different MCS adapted to their channel conditions, their transmissions are already synchronized in time, preventing interference and maintaining sensing accuracy.
2Measurement precision
If timing synchronization is implemented across multiple responders, then sensing accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases due to coordination requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The Sync field serves as a simplified intermediary mechanism that reduces system complexity compared to full coordination protocols. Instead of requiring complex inter-responder communication and coordination, the initiator simply embeds timing synchronization information in the Sync field within the downlink PPDU. Responders passively receive and apply this timing information without needing to exchange multiple coordination frames or perform complex synchronization algorithms, thus achieving timing alignment with minimal added complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
Each sensing responder autonomously processes the timing information received in the Sync field and independently aligns its own monostatic PPDU transmission timing. This self-service approach eliminates the need for centralized coordination of each responder's transmission schedule or complex inter-responder handshaking protocols. Each responder independently achieves timing synchronization based on the common reference provided in the Sync field, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining accurate timing alignment.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided is a method for sensing measurement. The method is applicable to a sensing initiator, and includes: transmitting a sensing request frame to at least one sensing responder using a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) in a parallel coordinated monostatic measurement; and receiving a sensing response frame transmitted by the at least one sensing responder using the first MCS, wherein the first MCS is an MCS specified in a protocol.


