Educational App Recommendation Indexing Education Standards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in correlating educational mobile applications with education standards to facilitate recommendations and assess student progress effectively, as existing systems lack the necessary correlation between applications and learning goals, making it difficult to identify appropriate apps and measure student achievement.

Innovation Solution

A system that receives activity tables from educational mobile applications, correlates learning activities with education standards, generates an index, and allows users to specify education standards, recommending aligned applications and assessing student achievement based on user responses and usage data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If educational mobile applications are made available without correlation to education standards, then the quantity of available applications increases, but the ability to identify appropriate applications and assess student progress deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of educational applicationsVSAvoidease of identifying appropriate applications
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-correlating learning activities in educational applications with education standards before users search for applications. The system maintains a database that already contains correlations between application activities and standards, so when users search for applications aligned with specific standards, the matching has already been performed in advance, eliminating the need for users to manually evaluate each application against standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by introducing a correlation database and indexing system that mediates between the large quantity of available applications and the education standards. This intermediary structure stores and manages the relationships between applications and standards, allowing users to query the system to find applications that match specific standards without having to directly compare each application against multiple standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual correlation between learning activities and education standards is performed, then measurement precision of student progress improves, but productivity of the system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of student progress assessmentVSAvoidproductivity of correlation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating a digital representation (correlation database) that replicates the relationships between learning activities and education standards. Instead of performing manual correlation each time, the system creates a copied structure of these relationships in the database, which can then be efficiently queried and processed by computers, maintaining measurement precision while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual correlation with an automated computer-based system. The correlation database and indexing mechanisms are processed electronically rather than through manual review, substituting human effort with automated computational processes that maintain precision while significantly increasing productivity and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If an index correlating learning activities to education standards is generated, then the ability to recommend aligned applications improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to recommend aligned applicationsVSAvoidcomplexity of correlation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the correlation system into distinct components: activity tables that define learning activities, a correlation database that stores relationships, an indexing system that organizes data for efficient retrieval, and a user interface that presents recommendations. This segmentation allows each component to be developed and maintained independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing the correlation database and indexing system to work with multiple education standards and various types of educational applications simultaneously. The system is built to be multi-functional, handling different subjects, grade levels, and standard frameworks through a unified architecture, which reduces complexity compared to creating separate systems for each standard or application type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If student responses and usage data are collected to determine achievement levels, then assessment accuracy improves, but loss of information privacy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of achievement assessmentVSAvoidloss of student privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by collecting and processing student data in a distributed manner across multiple components and locations. The system allows schools and educators to maintain local control over data collection policies, enabling them to specify what data is collected, how it is used, and how privacy is protected, while still achieving accurate assessment through aggregated information from multiple sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11429683B1Recommending educational application programs and assessing student progress in meeting education standards correlated to the applications
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 BETTER LEARNING INC
  • US11429683B1 patent drawing
  • US11429683B1 patent drawing
  • US11429683B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Activity tables for educational application programs are received. The activity tables list learning activities in the applications. Correlations of the learning activities to a set of education standards are received and an index based on the correlations is generated. A specification of an education standard a user is to satisfy is received. The index is scanned to identify which application programs have learning activities aligned to the specified education standard. User responses to the applications may be collected. Based on the user response and other usage data, the system may determine a user's level of achievement of the specified education standard.