Eductor Flame Suppressor for Pipeline Venting Flashback Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for removing high-pressure gases from isolated pipeline sections during hot tapping operations cannot completely eliminate the risk of explosions or flare-ups, as the gas can flashback into the pipeline before being rendered nonexplosive.

Innovation Solution

A flame suppressor system that includes a quench module with multiple ports and an injector, which accelerates the vented pipeline product to a velocity higher than its flame propagation speed, preventing flashback and ensuring the gas is rendered nonexplosive before exiting the pipeline.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gas is vented into the air during pipeline removal, then the gas can be discharged from the pipeline, but the gas may mix with air and create explosive mixtures that pose fire and explosion risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas removal efficiencyVSAvoidexplosion risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an inert gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide) into the vented pipeline product stream to displace oxygen and prevent formation of explosive mixtures. The inert gas is injected at a specific location in the vent line to ensure proper mixing and maintain an oxygen-deficient atmosphere throughout the discharge process, thereby eliminating the fire and explosion hazards associated with venting combustible gases into the air.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Productivity

If pressure is reduced in the pipeline during venting, then gas can be drawn out through vacuum, but flame propagation velocity exceeds gas expansion velocity causing potential explosions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas removal rateVSAvoidflame propagation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by injecting inert gas into the vented product stream before the gas can form explosive mixtures or experience flame propagation. The inert gas injection occurs at a predetermined location in the vent line that ensures the combustible gas is diluted and rendered non-flammable before any potential ignition source could cause an explosion, thereby preventing the harmful effect rather than responding to it after occurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If gas velocity is increased to prevent flashback, then flame propagation can be prevented, but the system becomes more complex with additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflashback preventionVSAvoidventing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses inert gas as an intermediary substance that is injected into the vented product stream to prevent flashback and flame propagation. Rather than relying solely on increasing gas velocity through complex mechanical means, the inert gas acts as a mediator that chemically prevents combustion by displacing oxygen and diluting the combustible gas concentration, thereby achieving flashback prevention with a relatively simple injection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the likelihood of explosions by ensuring the vented gas is accelerated to a velocity above its flame propagation speed, preventing ignition and ensuring safe disposal of the gas.

Implementation Method 1

an injector configured or arranged so that vented product has a higher velocity between the injector and the exhaust end than through the quench module. The injector, which may be an eductor (e.g., a jet pump or venturi pump), injects a non-combustible or inert gas or air—or a gas, like methane, under pressure—into the flame suppressor, thereby producing an eductor jet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjector: Injector

Implementation Method 2

The injector, which may be an eductor (e.g., a jet pump or venturi pump), injects a non-combustible or inert gas or air—or a gas, like methane, under pressure—into the flame suppressor, thereby producing an eductor jet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 3

The ports, which may be cylindrical, are configured or arranged such that vented pipeline product has a higher velocity through the quench module than through a pipeline tap. In embodiments, the ports provide a flow path having a cross-sectional area equal to that of a cross-sectional area of the pipeline tap.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric flow acceleration: Geometry

Implementation Method 4

The injector, which may be an eductor (e.g., a jet pump or venturi pump), injects a non-combustible or inert gas or air—or a gas, like methane, under pressure—into the flame suppressor, thereby producing an eductor jet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDilution:

Implementation Method 5

The injector, which may be an eductor (e.g., a jet pump or venturi pump), injects a non-combustible or inert gas or air—or a gas, like methane, under pressure—into the flame suppressor, thereby producing an eductor jet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEductor jet:

Data Source

PatentUS20250067403A1Educted flame suppressor
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 TDW DELAWARE INC
  • US20250067403A1 patent drawing
  • US20250067403A1 patent drawing
  • US20250067403A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame suppressor for venting pipelines, vessels or tanks containing a combustible gas includes a quench module and an injector located in a flow path of the vented pipeline product exiting the quench module. The injector introduces an educted jet of a second gas into the flow path so that vented pipeline product has speed above a flame propagation speed of the combustible gas. The second gas may be a non-combustible or inert gas or air and may be used to dilute, as well as accelerate, the vented pipeline product. Or the second gas may inject a combustible gas, for example, methane, still accelerating the vented pipeline product.