EEG Arousal Intensity Scoring via Automated Feature Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating sleep quality, particularly arousal intensity, are time-consuming and prone to subjective variability, failing to account for the visual intensity of arousals which may correlate with physiological changes and risk of complications.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method that statistically analyzes EEG signals to determine amplitude and power at different frequencies, selects specific features, normalizes them, and assigns an intensity scale value using a reference data set generated from visually inspected signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual scoring of arousal intensity is performed manually, then subjective assessment of arousal magnitude is possible, but the process is very time consuming and prone to inter-scorer variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearousal intensity assessmentVSAvoidscoring time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual visual inspection mechanism with an automated computer-based system that processes EEG signals. The automated system uses algorithms to detect arousals and assign intensity scale values, eliminating the need for human scorers to manually examine EEG traces. This substitution maintains measurement precision while dramatically reducing the time required for scoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a reference data set that serves as a standardized template for arousal intensity assessment. This reference data set, generated from visually inspected signals with known intensity values, is copied and applied to new EEG recordings through automated comparison. This allows consistent intensity scoring without requiring repeated manual inspection, thus reducing time while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual visual inspection of EEG signals is used to score arousals, then intensity differentiation is possible, but inter-scorer variability is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearousal intensity differentiationVSAvoidinter-scorer consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal automated scoring system that applies the same algorithms and reference data set to all EEG recordings, regardless of which scorer would have performed the manual inspection. This universal approach ensures that the same arousal patterns receive the same intensity ratings across different operators, eliminating inter-scorer variability while preserving the ability to differentiate arousal intensities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the subjective visual assessment process into an objective parameter-based system. By converting EEG signals into quantifiable features and comparing them against a reference data set with defined intensity parameters, the system replaces subjective human judgment with consistent parameter-based evaluation. This ensures reliable and reproducible intensity differentiation across different recordings and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If current automated systems count arousals without intensity consideration, then scoring is efficient, but important physiological information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring efficiencyVSAvoidarousal intensity information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the arousal assessment process into distinct components: detection of arousal events, extraction of intensity features, comparison with reference data, and assignment of intensity scale values. This segmentation allows the system to maintain efficient automated processing while incorporating detailed intensity analysis. Each arousal is independently evaluated for its intensity characteristics without requiring manual review of the entire recording.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds an intensity dimension to the traditional arousal counting approach. Instead of merely counting arousal events, the system evaluates each arousal across multiple dimensions including amplitude, frequency content, and duration, then assigns a composite intensity scale value. This additional dimensionality provides rich physiological information while maintaining automated efficiency through algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10349851B2Method, non-transitory computer readable medium and apparatus for arousal intensity scoring
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 YRT
  • US10349851B2 patent drawing
  • US10349851B2 patent drawing
  • US10349851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized method comprises statistically analyzing, using one or more processors, at least one section of a digitally recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signal that comprises an arousal segment to determine, for the arousal segment, at least one of amplitude and power at different frequencies as a function of time; selecting specified features from the results of the analysis and normalizing the selected features; and assigning, using one or more processors, an intensity scale value to the arousal segment based on the normalized selected features and a reference data set, the reference data set comprising normalized features corresponding to the normalized selected features and being generated based on a plurality of EEG signals comprising arousal segments to which intensity scale values have been assigned based on a visual inspection of the EEG signals.