EEG Curve Fitting for rTMS Stimulation Parameter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) do not effectively account for transient variations in brain EEG frequency, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method involves determining the pulse interval for rTMS or tACS by fitting a parametric curve to a short section of pre-recorded EEG, allowing for precise matching of pulse intervals to the transient EEG frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fixed frequency pulses are used for rTMS or tACS, then the treatment protocol is simple and easy to implement, but the treatment efficacy is suboptimal because it does not account for transient variations in EEG frequency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of treatment protocolVSAvoidtreatment efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, fixed-frequency stimulation approach into a dynamic system where the pulse frequency is continuously adjusted to match the instantaneous dominant frequency of the EEG signal. This is achieved by computing the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) or other time-frequency analysis methods to track frequency drift, and then adapting the stimulation frequency in real-time to follow these transient variations, thereby maintaining optimal resonance conditions throughout the treatment session.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the stimulation parameter (frequency) from a fixed value to a time-varying parameter that adapts to the EEG frequency. By monitoring the dominant frequency of EEG oscillations and adjusting the pulse frequency accordingly, the system maintains alignment with the brain's intrinsic oscillatory patterns, improving treatment efficacy while adding complexity to the protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the pulse frequency is adjusted to match the instantaneous dominant EEG frequency, then the treatment efficacy is improved, but the treatment protocol becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidcomplexity of treatment protocol
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the EEG signal is continuously monitored, the dominant frequency is extracted through spectral analysis, and this information feeds back to adjust the stimulation frequency. This closed-loop control system automatically tracks and adapts to frequency drift, providing improved efficacy while managing complexity through automation rather than manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary frequency analysis of the EEG signal before and during stimulation to establish the baseline dominant frequency and track its evolution. By pre-computing the frequency characteristics and preparing the adaptation algorithm in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during real-time stimulation and simplifies the overall implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the pulse frequency is adjusted to match the instantaneous dominant EEG frequency, then the treatment efficacy is improved, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidsimplicity of treatment protocol
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the stimulation system to automatically monitor its own performance by tracking the EEG frequency and self-adjusting the pulse frequency without external intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously detecting frequency drift and correcting the stimulation parameters, thereby maintaining optimal efficacy while reducing the operational burden on the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated feedback control where the system continuously monitors the EEG signal, detects dominant frequency changes, and automatically adjusts the stimulation frequency in response. This self-regulating mechanism eliminates the need for manual frequency adjustment by the operator, maintaining simplicity of operation while achieving adaptive efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise modulation of brain activity, potentially leading to improved treatment efficacy for various mental and neurological disorders by aligning stimulation with the individual's transient EEG frequency patterns.

Implementation Method 1

rTMS uses high energy magnetic pulses from a magnetic field generator that is positioned close to a person's head, so that the magnetic pulses affect a desired treatment region within the brain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The brain's neural oscillations arise from synchronous and coherent electrical activity, and can be recorded using an electroencephalogram (EEG)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical potential detection: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS20250161679A1EEG curve fitting to specify stimulation parameter
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 WAVE NEUROSCIENCE INC
  • US20250161679A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161679A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161679A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system is provided for administering a Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) or Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) at a pulse interval of is set equal to the period of a curve that best fits a section of a person's electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded before the pulse train.