EEG Disappointment Judgment Using Adaptive Event-Related Potential Standards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting disappointment signals in event-related potentials face challenges in accuracy due to variations in signal amplitude and latency across repeated trials, making it difficult to accurately judge user disappointment when the signal component varies.

Innovation Solution

A service providing system that measures event-related potentials and adjusts judgment standards based on the number of occurrences of the specific event-related potential, using a judgment standard storage section to select appropriate standards for judging presence or absence, thereby increasing accuracy in disappointment judgment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single template is used for disappointment judgment, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision deteriorates when the signal varies across repeated trials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejudgment standard structureVSAvoiddisappointment judgment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the judgment standard adaptable rather than fixed. The system dynamically selects or adjusts templates based on the number of times disappointment has occurred, allowing the judgment criterion to evolve with repeated measurements. This resolves the contradiction by enabling accurate measurement across varying signal conditions without requiring an overly complex predefined structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the judgment standard (template characteristics) based on the occurrence frequency of disappointment. By adjusting template parameters such as amplitude thresholds or temporal windows according to repeated trial data, the system maintains high measurement precision while avoiding the need for completely complex multiple-template structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple judgment standards are stored to account for signal variations, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisappointment judgment accuracyVSAvoidjudgment standard structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the judgment standard into a base template and adjustment components. Instead of storing entirely separate multiple templates, the system divides the judgment methodology into a fundamental template structure and trial-specific modification parameters, reducing overall complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing a base template and pre-defining adjustment rules for repeated trials. This preliminary preparation allows the system to handle signal variations efficiently during actual operation without requiring complex real-time processing of multiple full templates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If noise reduction methods are applied to extract signal components, then the measurement precision is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal component extraction accuracyVSAvoiddisappointment signal detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback by using the results of repeated disappointment measurements to refine and adjust the template for future judgments. This feedback mechanism improves signal component extraction accuracy over time while simplifying the detection process, as the system learns from previous trials rather than requiring increasingly complex noise reduction algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7472036B2Service providing system, service providing method, and program
Publication Date: 2008.12.30 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US7472036B2 patent drawing
  • US7472036B2 patent drawing
  • US7472036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A judgment section (200) judges the presence or absence of a specific event-related potential in an event-related potential of user's (50) electroencephalogram measured by a biological signal detection section (101). A judgment standard storage section (203) stores a plurality of judgment standards according to the number of occurrences of the specific event-related potential. A user's state judging section (201) obtains the number of occurrences of the specific event-related potential by referring to a judgment result storage section (20) and selects any of the judgment standards in the judgment standard storage section (203) according to the obtained number of occurrences thereof for judgment.