EEG and ERP Biomarker Assessment for rTMS Treatment Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for psychiatric and neurological disorders, such as depression and ADHD, have limited effectiveness, necessitating a personalized approach to improve treatment outcomes, particularly in identifying suitable candidates for neuromodulation therapies like rTMS.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing EEG and ERP data to assess individual susceptibility to neuromodulation treatments by comparing recorded brain activity with reference data, employing specific amplitude and frequency criteria to predict treatment response or non-response, and a device for processing this data to output assessment results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current drug treatments and psychotherapy are applied to treat psychiatric and neurological disorders, then treatment coverage is provided, but effectiveness is limited (40-60% for depression, 60-80% for ADHD)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidpersonalization of treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing EEG and ERP assessments before treatment to predict treatment response. This pre-assessment allows clinicians to identify which patients are likely to respond to neuromodulation treatments like rTMS, enabling treatment selection before committing to a specific therapy and avoiding ineffective treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by measuring specific EEG parameters (alpha peak frequency, theta/delta amplitude ratios, P300 amplitude) and ERP parameters to predict treatment response. These physiological parameters serve as biomarkers that change based on individual patient characteristics and predict susceptibility to different treatment modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If neuromodulation treatments like rTMS are applied, then localized brain treatment is achieved, but identification of suitable candidates is challenging without reliable predictive methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification of treatment candidatesVSAvoidprediction accuracy of treatment response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical trial-and-error treatment selection with a physiological measurement system based on EEG and ERP assessments. Instead of attempting multiple treatments to find what works, the system uses objective brain electrical activity measurements to predict treatment response, substituting empirical trial with physiological prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using baseline EEG and ERP measurements to predict treatment response, creating a feedback loop where pre-treatment physiological data informs treatment selection. This allows clinicians to receive feedback about predicted treatment efficacy before initiating treatment, enabling data-driven treatment decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2437658B1Method for assessing the susceptibility of a human individual suffering from a psychiatric or neurological disorder to neuromodulation treatment
Publication Date: 2019.08.21 MYND ANALYTICS INC
  • EP2437658B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2437658B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Method for assessing the susceptibility of a human individual suffering from a psychiatric or neurological disorder, in particular with depressed mood as a predominant feature, to neuromodulation treatment, in particular repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), the method comprising: a) Providing a dataset comprising electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and Event Related Potentials (ERP) data of said human individual; b) Assessing the susceptibility of said human individual to neuromodulation treatment based on said dataset.