Multi-channel EEG Neurofeedback System for Whole-Brain Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neurofeedback training methods are limited by focusing on single-channel or single-coherence training, which can lead to instability and adverse reactions in the brain, as they fail to account for the complex interconnectivity and dynamic nature of brain activity, often resulting in incomplete normalization and potential maladaptations.

Innovation Solution

A multivariate analysis-based biofeedback system that utilizes Z-scores from multiple EEG channels to provide comprehensive, real-time feedback on various metrics such as absolute power, coherence, and phase, allowing for whole-brain training and guiding the brain towards complex self-regulation tasks through auditory, visual, or vibrotactile cues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If single-channel or single-coherence training is used, then training simplicity is maintained, but brain stability deteriorates and adverse reactions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining simplicityVSAvoidbrain stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple EEG channels (at least two channels with multiple electrodes each) and computes multiple coherence metrics simultaneously. Instead of training on a single channel or coherence value, the system integrates information from multiple channels and calculates coherence between different electrode pairs, creating a comprehensive multivariate training protocol that stabilizes brain activity while maintaining operational feasibility through automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions simultaneously by computing various coherence metrics (absolute coherence, relative coherence, phase coherence) across multiple channels. This multivariate approach allows the single training protocol to address multiple brain regions and neural pathways at once, providing comprehensive brain stabilization without requiring separate training sessions for different parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If single-channel training is used, then device complexity is reduced, but normalization completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidnormalization completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional single-channel training to multi-dimensional whole-head training by utilizing at least two EEG channels with multiple electrodes. This dimensional expansion allows the system to capture and normalize brain activity across multiple spatial dimensions simultaneously, achieving comprehensive normalization that accounts for the complex three-dimensional nature of brain function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the brain into multiple monitoring zones by placing electrodes at specific locations (e.g., Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, O1, O2) and computing coherence metrics for different channel pairs. This segmentation allows targeted normalization of specific brain regions while maintaining overall brain balance, achieving complete normalization through localized adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If multi-channel multivariate training is implemented, then brain normalization completeness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenormalization completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously monitoring multiple EEG channels and coherence metrics, comparing actual brain activity against target values, and providing immediate feedback to guide the training process. This feedback mechanism automates the complex computations and adjustments required for multivariate training, reducing the operational complexity despite the increased normalization completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts training parameters based on real-time brain state measurements. By monitoring multiple coherence metrics simultaneously and adapting the training protocol based on observed patterns, the system achieves comprehensive normalization without requiring manual intervention for each parameter adjustment, thereby managing complexity through automated parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive multivariate feedback is provided, then self-regulation effectiveness is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-regulation effectivenessVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and provides feedback on the most relevant coherence metrics while filtering out redundant information. By selecting specific coherence measurements (absolute coherence, relative coherence, phase coherence) from the multiple available channels and presenting only the most informative data to the trainee, the system maintains effective self-regulation guidance while reducing the information processing load on the brain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9706939B2Multi-channel, multi-variate whole-head normalization and optimization system using live Z-scores
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 BRAINMASTER TECH
  • US9706939B2 patent drawing
  • US9706939B2 patent drawing
  • US9706939B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of whole-brain EEG neurofeedback training of a trainee using live Z-scores from 4 channels of EEG signals to acquire 248 Z-scores from 6 simultaneous interconnectivity paths. The feedback system is endowed with the ability to establish training targets and to use derived metrics to produce feedback of an auditory, visual, vibrotactile, or other sensory or direct nature. The feedback signals are determined by a multivariate analysis that takes into consideration how measured variables compare with predefined criteria, thus producing a statistical correlation in real-time, in conjunction with a reference or normative database, rule-set, algorithm, discriminate function, or classification system.