EEG-Text Anomaly Detection with PU Contrastive Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical diagnostic methods face challenges with limited detection accuracy due to imbalanced multimodal data, high labeling costs, and difficulty in obtaining labeled multimodal data, leading to inefficient and inaccurate anomaly detection.

Innovation Solution

An anomaly detection method using PU contrastive learning within a multimodal prototype network, incorporating a dilated convolutional network, BERT model, and multi-head self-attention mechanism for feature extraction and fusion, combined with a self-supervised contrast learning strategy to estimate unbiased risk and correct data imbalance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If data enhancement techniques are used to balance positive and negative samples, then the number of positive samples is increased, but the intrinsic correlation of data is not fully captured and additional noise is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of positive samplesVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-supervised learning where the model learns from unlabeled multimodal data itself without requiring external labeling. The contrastive learning mechanism enables the model to automatically discover patterns and correlations in the data, making the system self-sufficient in learning from the available data distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the learning paradigm from supervised classification to self-supervised contrastive learning, fundamentally altering how the model processes data. By using contrastive loss functions and information bottleneck principles, the system transforms the learning objective to focus on capturing intrinsic data correlations without relying on labeled examples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If semi-supervised learning is used to learn from unlabeled data, then useful information is extracted from unlabeled samples, but model convergence is difficult and collapse is easy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation from unlabeled dataVSAvoidmodel convergence
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary feature extraction and representation learning from unlabeled multimodal data using contrastive learning before final classification. By pre-learning robust feature representations that capture the intrinsic structure of the data, the model is better prepared for subsequent supervised fine-tuning, improving convergence stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the model's predictions on unlabeled data are used to generate pseudo-labels, which then feed back into the training process. This iterative refinement allows the model to progressively improve its understanding of the data distribution while maintaining stable convergence through controlled feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If labeled multimodal data is obtained for training, then detection accuracy is improved, but labeling cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidlabeling cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses only a small subset of labeled positive samples combined with a large amount of unlabeled data for training. By applying self-supervised learning techniques, the model achieves effective learning without requiring extensive labeled data, significantly reducing labeling costs while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces self-supervised contrastive learning as an intermediary mechanism that bridges the gap between unlabeled and labeled data. This intermediary learning process enables the model to learn meaningful representations from unlabeled data that can be effectively transferred to the final classification task, reducing dependency on expensive labeled data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If single modal detection is used, then labeling cost is reduced, but detection accuracy is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling costVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple modalities (EEG signals and text data) into a unified multimodal representation framework. By combining complementary information from different data sources through feature fusion and joint learning, the system achieves superior detection accuracy that exceeds what any single modality could provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal multimodal detection framework that can process and integrate different types of data (physiological signals, text, and potentially other modalities). This multi-functional system is designed to handle diverse input types simultaneously, making it adaptable to various diagnostic scenarios while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250308692A1Anomaly detection method and system based on PU contrastive learning within multimodal prototype network
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 HEFEI UNIV OF TECH
  • US20250308692A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308692A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An anomaly detection method based on PU contrastive learning within a multimodal prototype network that employs dilated convolutional networks and Bert models to form a multimodal data (EEG and text) feature extraction and fusion network. Through a multimodal feature enhanced prototype network, clustering is performed, but the results are biased due to the lack of labeled negative samples. Finally, a positive unlabeled learning method that integrates contrastive learning is used to estimate the unbiased risk of the biased clustering results, correct the deviation, and accurately identify the positive and negative samples. By analyzing a limited number of multimodal positive samples and a large amount of unlabeled data, the anomaly detection method can accurately classify positive samples and negative samples without the need for expensive manual labeling costs. It also adopts a self-supervised learning framework, integrating PU learning into contrastive learning to correct the classification deviation.