EEG-Based Volitional Control Training via Closed-Loop Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for training volitional control of bodily functions through brain-computer interfaces are inefficient in providing targeted and effective stimulation for improving mental activity and movement control, particularly for individuals with neurological diseases or cognitive impairments.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising an electrode cap, a brain-computer interface, a control unit, and stimulation units that apply specific stimuli to the body based on EEG measurement data analysis, allowing for targeted training and feedback to enhance volitional control of body parts through various types of stimuli such as vibro-tactile, auditory, and functional electrical stimulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional brain-computer interface methods are used to detect mental activities, then measurement of perceptual capacity is achieved, but training effectiveness for volitional control is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of mental activitiesVSAvoidtraining effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies feedback by delivering indicating stimuli to the body part when specific mental activities are detected through EEG analysis. This closed-loop feedback mechanism reinforces the association between mental intent and physical sensation, thereby improving training effectiveness for volitional control while maintaining accurate detection of mental activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If no targeted stimulation is applied during mental activity detection, then the measurement process is simple, but learning outcomes and training effectiveness are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning outcomesVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the EEG measurement function with the stimulation function into a single integrated training device. The electrode cap records brain currents while stimulation units deliver indicating stimuli to the same body part, combining detection and training functions to improve learning outcomes without requiring separate complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The training device performs multiple functions: it detects mental activities through EEG, analyzes brain current patterns, determines correspondence values, and delivers indicating stimuli. This multi-functional approach enables both measurement and training within a single system, enhancing productivity while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If indicating stimuli are applied to reinforce correct mental activities, then training effectiveness increases, but the system requires complex control and analysis mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol unit requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter changes in EEG signals (amplitude, frequency, pattern matching) to determine when indicating stimuli should be applied. By monitoring changes in brain current parameters and comparing them against reference patterns, the control unit can automatically trigger appropriate stimuli without requiring overly complex decision-making mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables rapid and effective acquisition and training of volitional control of body parts by analyzing EEG data to apply appropriate stimuli, increasing learning outcomes and training effectiveness by reinforcing correct mental activities and suppressing incorrect ones, thus improving the ability to control bodily functions.

Implementation Method 1

an evaluation unit, in particular a brain-computer interface, which is connected downstream of the electrode cap and which is designed to measure respective voltages present at the electrodes and to provide measurement results as EEG measurement data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroencephalography (EEG):

Implementation Method 2

stimulation electrodes for the application of functional electrical stimulation to stimulate a point on the body of the test subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFunctional electrical stimulation:

Data Source

PatentUS11207491B2Device and method for the learning of the deliberate control of a specified body part by a test subject
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 GUGER CHRISTOPH
  • US11207491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A training and simulation assembly for the learning of deliberate control of a specified body part by a test subject contains an electrode cap, which has a number of electrodes, and an evaluation unit, which is configured to measure voltages present at the electrodes and to provide measurement results as EEG measurement data. The evaluation unit analyzes the EEG measurement data for the presence of a mental act and to determine a correspondence value, which indicates the correspondence of the EEG measurement data with reference values defined by the mental act. A control unit and a simulation unit are provided. The simulation unit stimulates the body of the test subject at a specified point of the body and/or to trigger a motion. The control unit controls the stimulation unit and the ability to apply an indicating stimulus to the body part by the stimulation unit.