EEPROM Floating Gate Architecture for Over-Erase Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flash EEPROM cells face challenges in achieving smaller cell sizes due to over-erase issues in stack-gate structures and increased complexity and size in split-gate structures, which affect the scalability and integration of nonvolatile memory devices.

Innovation Solution

A novel method for manufacturing EEPROM cells involves forming a semiconductor substrate with a gate oxide layer, tunnel oxide layer, and polysilicon structures, including angle doping with specific dopant ions to create a floating gate and selective gate configuration that reduces transistor size and eliminates over-erase problems while maintaining the advantages of split-gate structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a stack gate structure is used, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the chip size increases and over-erase problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidchip size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The gate structure is segmented into multiple gates (first control gate, second control gate, and select gate) positioned at different locations. This segmentation allows each gate to perform specific functions independently, reducing the overall area required while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a planar gate arrangement to a three-dimensional configuration where gates are positioned at different heights and locations. The first and second control gates are arranged vertically, while the select gate is positioned laterally, utilizing spatial dimensions to reduce footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a split gate structure is used, then over-erase problems are eliminated, but the chip size increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveover-erase problem eliminationVSAvoidchip size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the select gate function from the traditional split-gate configuration and positions it separately at a lateral location. This separation allows the control gates to be closely positioned vertically, reducing area while maintaining the over-erase protection function of the select gate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The first control gate serves multiple functions: it controls the floating gate for data storage and works with the second control gate to prevent over-erase conditions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional structures, thereby reducing chip size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a split gate structure is used, then over-erase problems are eliminated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveover-erase problem eliminationVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control functions into a unified multi-gate structure where the first control gate, second control gate, and select gate work together as an integrated system. This combination simplifies the overall device architecture compared to traditional split-gate structures while maintaining over-erase protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the fabrication of smaller-sized EEPROM cells with improved scalability and reduced complexity, addressing the limitations of conventional techniques by providing a more efficient and compact nonvolatile memory device architecture.

Implementation Method 1

forming a gate oxide layer over the semiconductor substrate... depositing a first polysilicon layer over the tunnel oxide layer and over the gate oxide layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapour Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

angle doping with a first dopant at a first dose and a first energy level the floating gate to obtain a first doped region and a second doped region in the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon Implantation: Ion Implantation

Data Source

PatentUS8470669B2System and method for EEPROM architecture
Publication Date: 2013.06.25 SEMICON MFG INT (SHANGHAI) CORP
  • US8470669B2 patent drawing
  • US8470669B2 patent drawing
  • US8470669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing an Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM) device includes providing a substrate and forming a gate oxide over the substrate. Also, the method includes providing a mask overlying the gate oxide layer, the mask defining a tunnel opening. The method additionally includes performing selective etching over the mask to form a tunnel oxide layer. The method includes forming a floating gate over the tunnel oxide layer and a selective gate over the gate oxide layer. The method includes angle doping a region of the substrate using the floating gate as a mask to obtain a first doped region. The method further includes forming a dielectric layer over the floating gate and a control gate over the dielectric layer. The method additionally includes angle doping a second region of the substrate using the selective gate as a mask to obtain a second doped region, wherein the first and second doped regions partially overlap.