EEPROM Tunneling Transistor Gate Width Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single gate structure EPROMs face challenges with unreliable electrical erasure, despite their simplified manufacturing process and compatibility with logic devices.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a tunneling transistor with a narrower gate width and integrally joined source and drain junction regions, formed through ion implantation, to enable electrical erasure while maintaining a small cell size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single gate structure is used in EPROM, then the manufacturing process is simplified and compatibility with logic devices is improved, but electrical erasure becomes unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidelectrical erasure reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the single gate structure into two separate gates: a first gate (control gate) and a second gate (tunneling gate). This segmentation allows the first gate to control program/erase operations while the second gate enables reliable electrical erasure through Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and erasure reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual gate structure provides multi-functionality where the first gate handles control and programming operations, while the second gate specifically enables electrical erasure. This universal design maintains compatibility with standard CMOS processes while adding the capability for reliable electrical erasure that single gate structures lack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a stacked-gate structure is used in EPROM, then device integration is improved, but the manufacturing process becomes relatively complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by forming the second gate (tunneling gate) only in specific regions where erasure is needed, rather than using a full stacked-gate structure throughout. This selective application maintains the benefits of integration while avoiding the complexity of complete stacked-gate manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of vertically stacking gates in the third dimension (stacked-gate structure), the invention places the first and second gates side-by-side in the planar dimension. This dimensional change achieves the functional benefits of dual gates while maintaining a simpler manufacturing process compatible with standard CMOS technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If the gate width of the tunneling transistor is reduced, then erase time is reduced and erasure reliability is improved, but the cell area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerase timeVSAvoidcell area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the gate width a dynamic parameter, allowing it to be optimized for its specific function (erasure) rather than being constrained by the overall cell dimensions. The tunneling gate width can be independently adjusted to achieve fast erasure times while the overall cell area is managed through efficient layout of the dual gate structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the critical parameter of gate width specifically for the tunneling transistor to optimize erasure performance. By independently controlling the second gate width (W2) to be narrower than the first gate width (W1), the patent achieves reduced erase time and improved erasure reliability without necessarily increasing the overall cell area, as the gates are arranged in a space-efficient dual-gate configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable electrical erasure of electrons trapped in the floating transistor, enhancing junction breakdown voltage and reducing erase time with adjustable erasure voltage, while maintaining a compact cell structure.

Implementation Method 1

a tunneling transistor formed on/over a semiconductor substrate and configured to erase electrons trapped in the floating transistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFowler-Nordheim tunneling:

Implementation Method 2

formed through ion implantation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Data Source

PatentUS8779497B2Electrical erasable programmable read-only memory and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 DONGBU HITEK CO LTD
  • US8779497B2 patent drawing
  • US8779497B2 patent drawing
  • US8779497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrical erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) including a floating transistor formed on a semiconductor substrate and a tunneling transistor formed on a semiconductor substrate and configured to erase electrons trapped in the floating transistor. The tunneling transistor has a source junction region and a drain junction region that are integrally joined by lateral diffusion. The EPROM maintains a small cell size without any additional mask process, and is useable as an MTP EEPROM because electrical erasure is enabled. In addition, the adjustment of the width of a gate constituting the tunneling transistor ensures an improved degree of freedom to adjust an erasure voltage can be enhanced.