EFEM Robot Auto Teaching for Position Shift Reprogramming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor fabrication facilities, EFEM robots undergo positional changes due to maintenance or other events, requiring re-programming to avoid substrate damage, which is time-consuming and prone to human error when done manually.

Innovation Solution

An automatic teaching element determines positional parameters to generate new movement commands, allowing EFEM robots to adjust their paths without human intervention, thereby accounting for positional changes and preventing substrate damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual re-programming is used to adjust EFEM robot paths after positional changes, then the robot can be re-programmed to avoid substrate damage, but the process is time-consuming and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming accuracyVSAvoidre-programming time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the EFEM robot to automatically re-program itself by detecting its new position and generating updated movement commands without human intervention. The controller autonomously calculates the positional offset and adjusts the movement path parameters, allowing the robot to service its own re-programming needs after maintenance or positional changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical re-programming process with an automated computational system. Instead of operators physically adjusting robot parameters, the system uses automated position detection and computational algorithms to calculate and apply the necessary movement command adjustments, substituting human-operated mechanical adjustment with automated electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual re-programming is performed after EFEM robot positional changes, then movement paths can be adjusted, but human error increases and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidre-programming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The EFEM robot system performs self-re-programming by automatically detecting its new position and generating corrected movement commands. This eliminates the need for operators to manually intervene in the complex re-programming process, allowing the system to maintain high productivity while reducing operational complexity through autonomous self-adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously monitors the EFEM robot's actual position, compares it with the expected position, and automatically generates corrective movement commands when deviations are detected. This closed-loop feedback approach simplifies operation by eliminating manual intervention while maintaining high productivity through automated real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If automated re-programming is implemented, then time is saved and human error is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate handling safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated re-programming system uses feedback from position sensors to detect EFEM robot positional changes and automatically generates corrected movement commands. This feedback-based approach enhances substrate handling safety by ensuring accurate position compensation while managing system complexity through the use of established sensor and controller integration already present in modern semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual re-programming operations with automated electronic control systems that calculate and apply position corrections. While this substitution increases electronic control complexity, it eliminates the need for manual intervention and reduces operational errors, ultimately improving substrate handling safety through more reliable automated control compared to human-operated mechanical adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11984331B2EFEM robot auto teaching methodology
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11984331B2 patent drawing
  • US11984331B2 patent drawing
  • US11984331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to an equipment front end module (EFEM) teaching element. The EFEM teaching element includes a memory element configured to store data describing an initial position of an EFEM robot within an EFEM chamber. A position measurement device is configured to take measurements describing a new position of the EFEM robot within the EFEM chamber that is different than the initial position of the EFEM robot. A controller is configured to determine a set of new movement commands describing a path of the EFEM robot based upon the data describing the initial position of the EFEM robot and the measurements.