Effect-Loaded Video Moderation Using Automated Effect Replication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methodologies for reviewing user-created effects on social media platforms are unreliable and inefficient due to technical errors and misinterpretations introduced by human reviewers, leading to false rejections and delays in moderation timelines.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that autonomously collects user-created effects, identifies appropriate algorithms, and simulates user input actions to generate effect-loaded videos for accurate replication and review, utilizing the same effect creation platform to load effects onto template videos.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human reviewers manually review user-created effects, then the review process can be performed with human judgment, but technical errors and misinterpretations occur leading to false rejections and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview accuracyVSAvoidmoderation timeline
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows effects to review themselves by automatically generating effect-loaded videos that demonstrate the effect's functionality. The effect package includes metadata and algorithms that enable self-replication and self-demonstration, eliminating reliance on human reviewers to interpret and manually test effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of human reviewers applying effects to videos is replaced with an automated computational system. The system uses algorithms from the effect package to automatically generate template videos and apply effects, substituting human manual operations with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If human reviewers manually apply effects to template videos, then effects can be visualized for review, but technical errors and misinterpretations are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffect replication accuracyVSAvoidreview consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates accurate copies of the effect's intended functionality by using the effect package's metadata and algorithms to generate template videos. This automated copying process ensures consistent replication of effects without human interpretation errors, producing reliable review materials that accurately represent the effect's behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically selecting appropriate template videos and pre-applying effects before the review process. This includes identifying algorithms from the effect package, selecting matching template videos, and generating effect-loaded videos in advance, preparing all review materials beforehand to eliminate manual errors during actual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated systems are used to generate effect-loaded videos, then review efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The effect package serves multiple functions: it contains the effect definition, metadata for identification, algorithms for replication, and instructions for video generation. This multi-functional package structure enables a single automated system to handle effect review end-to-end, from identification to video generation, without requiring separate specialized systems for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses template videos as intermediaries between the effect package and the final review process. Template videos serve as standardized base materials that the automated system can efficiently process and modify with effects, acting as a mediator that simplifies the review workflow while maintaining accuracy and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250384900A1Content moderation systems for effect-loaded videos
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 LEMON INC(GB)
  • US20250384900A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384900A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384900A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations for a content review system for effect-loaded videos are provided. One aspect includes a computer system for generating effect-loaded videos, the computer system comprising processing circuitry and memory storing instructions that, when executed, causes the processing circuitry to: receive an effect package comprising metadata relating to a set of effects capable of being applied to a video file; identify a set of algorithms relating to the set of effects based on the metadata of the effect package; select a set of template videos based on the set of algorithms; generate a set of effect-loaded videos by applying the set of effects to the set of template videos; and output the set of effect-loaded videos.