Efficacy-Based Content Recommendation for Driving Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content recommendation systems fail to provide content items based on a user's specific situation, often recommending items that are ineffective and distracting, particularly for users engaged in activities like driving.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a processor and memory to receive user identification and sensor data, determine the current situation, and generate efficacy scores for candidate items based on a user efficacy model, eliminating and ranking items to provide relevant recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing content recommendation systems recommend content items based on user preferences, then user satisfaction is improved, but safety and appropriateness deteriorate due to distracting recommendations in inappropriate situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidsafety and appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the user's current situation. By continuously monitoring situational context (such as driving conditions, time of day, location), the system adapts recommendation generation to ensure appropriateness while maintaining user satisfaction. This resolves the contradiction by making the system flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of recommendation generation based on situational context. When detecting situations where recommendations may be harmful (e.g., driving), the system modifies recommendation parameters such as frequency, type, and timing of recommendations. This allows the system to maintain user satisfaction in safe contexts while preventing harmful recommendations in inappropriate situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides comprehensive content recommendations, then user needs coverage is improved, but recommendation accuracy deteriorates due to irrelevant recommendations in specific situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser needs coverageVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system applies different recommendation strategies to different situational contexts. Instead of using a uniform approach, the system tailors recommendation quality and type to specific local conditions (e.g., different recommendations for driving vs. resting situations). This ensures comprehensive coverage across various user needs while maintaining high accuracy within each specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically filters and adjusts recommendations based on real-time situational analysis. By continuously evaluating the current context against user preferences and historical data, the system maintains comprehensive coverage of user needs while ensuring that only situationally appropriate recommendations are presented, thereby improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the system analyzes multiple data sources for recommendation generation, then recommendation relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system segments the complex data analysis task into distinct modular components: user profile analysis, situational context analysis, preference matching, and recommendation generation. Each module processes specific data sources independently and passes results to the next stage. This segmentation maintains high recommendation relevance through comprehensive data analysis while managing system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers that aggregate and synthesize data from multiple sources before final recommendation generation. These intermediaries (such as context analysis modules and preference matching layers) simplify the integration of diverse data sources, maintaining recommendation relevance while reducing the overall system complexity by organizing data flow in a structured manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9916362B2Content recommendation based on efficacy models
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9916362B2 patent drawing
  • US9916362B2 patent drawing
  • US9916362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes a system and method for providing recommendation items to users. The system includes a processor and a memory storing instructions that when executed cause the system to: receive identification input data associated with a user; identify the user using the identification input data; receive sensor data; determine a current situation associated with the user from one or more predefined situations described by predefined situation data and associated parameters; receive data describing a set of candidate items; generate a set of efficacy scores for the set of candidate items; eliminate one or more candidate items from the set of candidate items to obtain one or more remaining candidate items; rank the one or more remaining candidate items based on one or more associated efficacy scores; and provide one or more recommendation items to the user from the one or more ranked remaining candidate items.