Effluent Containment Sidewall Flame Spread Index Control

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional safety procedures in petrochemical plants may be insufficient in preventing external initiation sources of combustion during hydroblasting operations, as they primarily focus on mitigating electrostatic discharge risks within containment devices, neglecting potential external ignition sources like sparks from welding or torch-cutting.

Innovation Solution

The effluent containment device incorporates a sidewall made of flame-resistant material with a Flame Spread Index (FSI) greater than zero but no more than 70, which is also anti-static to prevent self-sustaining combustion and electrostatic discharge, ensuring the device does not support combustion initiation from external sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional materials are used for effluent containment device sidewalls, then the device is flexible and easy to manufacture, but the device is vulnerable to external ignition sources and supports self-sustaining combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the flame spread index parameter of the sidewall material from conventional values (typically greater than 70) to a controlled range of greater than zero and no more than 70. This parameter modification provides fire resistance while maintaining the flexibility and manufacturability of the containment device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material construction for the sidewall, combining base materials with flame-retardant additives or coatings. This creates a composite structure that achieves the desired flame spread index while preserving the flexibility and ease of manufacture associated with conventional materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If metal shields are used to protect from external fire sources, then fire protection is improved, but the device complexity increases and flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding metal shields, the patent modifies the flame spread index parameter of the existing sidewall material to be no more than 70. This single parameter change provides fire protection while avoiding the structural complexity and loss of flexibility that would result from adding metal components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional safety procedures are followed, then electrostatic discharge risks are mitigated, but external ignition sources from welding or torch-cutting are not protected against

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-treating the sidewall material with flame-retardant properties (controlling flame spread index to 70 or less) before exposure to external ignition sources. This preliminary protection measure counteracts the harmful effect of external ignition sources such as welding sparks or torch-cutting flames, complementing the existing electrostatic discharge protection from conventional safety procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively enhances the safety of effluent containment devices by preventing self-sustaining combustion and managing electrostatic discharge, providing a more comprehensive safety measure against external ignition sources during hydroblasting operations.

Implementation Method 1

formed of material comprising a flame-resistant material having Flame Spread Index (FSI) greater than zero and no more than 70. The sidewall does not support self-sustaining combustion upon encountering a combustion initiation source.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame resistance: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The buildup of an electrostatic charge, sometimes referred to as flow electrification, could possibly result in an electrostatic discharge in the presence of hydrocarbons in an effluent containment device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic discharge: Electrostatic Discharge

Data Source

PatentUS12109596B2Effluent containment devices having improved safety
Publication Date: 2024.10.08
  • US12109596B2 patent drawing
  • US12109596B2 patent drawing
  • US12109596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Effluent containment devices are made of flame-resistant material having a Flame Spread Index of greater than zero and less than 30. The material may also have anti-static properties, such as being formed of a dissipative material or one that resists flow electrification.