E-Fuel Energy Storage System with Independent Charger and Cell

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy storage technologies, such as solid-state batteries and flow batteries, face challenges in scalability, cost, energy density, and stability, making them unsuitable for large-scale, efficient, and flexible energy storage solutions for intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.

Innovation Solution

An e-fuel energy storage system comprising electroactive liquid fuels, an e-fuel charger, and an e-fuel cell, where the charger and cell are independently designed to optimize performance, using materials like V2+/V3+, methylbipyridine-ferrocene, and sulfur hosted in zinc oxide yolk-shell structures, allowing for efficient charging and discharging of energy, with high power density and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If solid-state batteries are used for energy storage, then portability and compactness are improved, but scalability, cost, and lifetime are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompactnessVSAvoidlifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the energy storage system into two independent parts: a flow battery for bulk energy storage and a solid-state battery for portable applications. The flow battery uses liquid electrolytes stored in external tanks with pumps for circulation, while the solid-state battery provides compact, portable energy storage. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its strengths - the flow battery achieves long lifetime and scalability, while the solid-state battery maintains compactness and portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If flow batteries are used for energy storage, then scalability and lifetime are improved, but cost and energy density are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs composite material strategies in the flow battery design, using iron-based redox couples (Fe2+/Fe3+) combined with organic mediators and conductive polymers. This composite approach enhances the energy density of the liquid electrolyte while maintaining the scalability and long lifetime characteristics of flow battery architecture. The use of iron-based materials also reduces cost compared to traditional vanadium-based flow batteries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Quantity of substance

If conventional energy storage systems are used, then energy storage capacity is improved, but response speed and dynamic power compensation are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage capacityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements a dynamic response system where the flow battery is equipped with controllable pumps and valves that can rapidly adjust electrolyte flow rates to match power demand changes. The system includes fast-responding electrochemical reactions at the electrodes that can quickly convert between chemical and electrical energy. This dynamic design enables the system to provide both large-scale energy storage and rapid power compensation, responding to grid fluctuations within seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If existing energy storage technologies are deployed, then some energy storage function is achieved, but environmental impact and sustainability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage functionVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention fundamentally changes the chemical parameters of the energy storage system by using iron-based redox couples (Fe2+/Fe3+) instead of traditional vanadium-based electrolytes. Iron is abundant, non-toxic, and environmentally benign compared to vanadium. The system also uses organic mediators and conductive polymers that are environmentally friendly. This parameter change maintains reliable energy storage function while dramatically reducing environmental impact and improving sustainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The e-fuel system provides scalable, cost-effective, and stable energy storage and release, achieving high energy efficiency and flexibility, enabling widespread deployment of renewable energy sources and potential applications in electric vehicles with extended driving ranges.

Implementation Method 1

The e-fuel charger, comprising an anode, a cathode, and a membrane independent from the e-fuel cell, is configured for charging the e-fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

The e-fuel cell, comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and a membrane, is configured for discharging the e-fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 3

The e-fuel charger, comprising an anode, a cathode, and a membrane independent from the e-fuel cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Data Source

PatentUS11050079B2Electro-fuel energy storage system and method
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 THE HONG KONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US11050079B2 patent drawing
  • US11050079B2 patent drawing
  • US11050079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An e-fuel energy storage system and method are provided. The e-fuel energy storage system comprises e-fuel, an e-fuel charger, and an e-fuel cell, wherein the component such as an electrode and membranes, material, and design configured to charge the e-fuel are independent and different from the component such as an electrode and membranes, material, and design configured to discharge the e-fuel.