eFuse Macro Switching Unit for Abnormal Resistance Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional eFuse macros face challenges in accurately distinguishing between blown and unblown fuses due to abnormal resistance variations, leading to increased defective parts per million (DPPM), as the resistance of blown fuses can be similar to that of unblown fuses due to process variations or other factors.

Innovation Solution

The eFuse macro incorporates a switching unit with different resistances in normal and test modes, utilizing a reference resistor and a verifying resistor to generate output signals indicating whether a fuse is blown or not, thereby providing a serious condition to screen out blown fuses with marginal fail resistance without increasing testing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional sensing methods are used to determine fuse state, then the sensing circuit is simple, but the measurement precision deteriorates when fuse resistance is abnormal due to process variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuse state detection accuracyVSAvoidsensing circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing circuit dynamically switches between normal mode and test mode based on the state of the switching unit. In normal mode, the circuit operates with standard sensing parameters. When the switching unit detects an abnormal condition (such as marginal fail resistance), it transitions to test mode where the resistance of the switching unit changes to provide a more distinguishable sensing condition, thereby improving measurement precision for abnormal fuses without requiring a completely different circuit design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the resistance parameter of the switching unit between normal mode and test mode. By adjusting the resistance of the switching unit, the sensing circuit can adapt to different fuse states. In test mode, the switching unit's resistance is modified to create a more significant resistance difference between blown and unblown fuses, improving the ability to detect abnormal fuse states while maintaining circuit simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If additional testing procedures are implemented to screen marginal fail fuses, then the measurement precision improves, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarginal fail fuse detection accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing process is divided into periodic phases: normal mode operation for routine sensing and test mode for periodic verification. The switching unit enables periodic transition to test mode where marginal fail fuses are screened with enhanced precision. This periodic action allows accurate detection of abnormal fuses while maintaining fast normal operation, as the test mode is only activated when needed rather than continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The switching unit is pre-configured to enable rapid transition between normal and test modes. The circuit is designed with preliminary switching mechanisms that allow immediate mode change without extensive reconfiguration, reducing the time penalty for performing additional testing. The test mode capability is prepared in advance, allowing quick screening of marginal fail fuses when triggered

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves DPPM by accurately differentiating between blown and unblown fuses, even with abnormal resistance, without extending testing time, by employing resistors that provide distinct conditions in normal and test modes.

Implementation Method 1

An eFuse may be programmed by applying a relatively large amount of power (e.g. a current with sufficient magnitude and duration) to the fuse to be programmed, so as to melt and separate the fuse body material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

According to the resistance of the eFuse, the state of the eFuse is sensed to determine whether the eFuse is blown or not

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS9171639B2eFuse macro
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 MEDIATEK INC
  • US9171639B2 patent drawing
  • US9171639B2 patent drawing
  • US9171639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An eFuse with at least one fuse unit is provided. The fuse unit includes a first common node providing a first reference voltage, a second common node providing a second reference voltage, at least one fuse coupled to the first common node, and a determining unit coupled between the fuse and the second common node, generating an output signal indicating whether the fuse is blown or not according to a first condition in a normal mode and a second condition in a test mode.