Egg Transfer Module With Free-Moving Ejector for Passive Displacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanical egg processing systems face challenges in consistently and safely displacing eggs of various shapes, sizes, and orientations without cracking, while also being complex, difficult to maintain, and requiring significant power.

Innovation Solution

An egg transfer module with a free-moving ejector mechanism that interacts with an abutment to displace eggs from a securing device, allowing for passive ejection without active mechanical actuation, and using resilient materials to grasp and release eggs securely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical gripping devices are used to displace eggs, then eggs can be securely held and transferred, but the risk of egg cracking increases and the system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg displacement consistencyVSAvoidegg cracking risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping device is segmented into multiple fingers that can independently move, allowing the egg to be held securely at multiple contact points while distributing displacement forces to prevent cracking. The fingers can be actuated separately to provide gentle, controlled displacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping device incorporates compliant or flexible elements that allow dynamic adaptation to the egg's shape and orientation. The fingers can deform elastically to conform to the egg surface, providing secure grip without rigid contact points that could cause cracking during displacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If complex mechanical displacement mechanisms are implemented, then egg displacement capability is improved, but device complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg displacement capabilityVSAvoidmechanical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping device uses elastic recovery of flexible fingers to automatically return them to their initial position after grasping, eliminating the need for complex retraction mechanisms. The system serves itself by utilizing the inherent elasticity of its components rather than requiring additional actuators for reset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Complex mechanical displacement mechanisms are replaced with a simpler system using suction cups or compliant fingers that rely on pressure differential or elastic deformation rather than motorized actuators. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining displacement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If active mechanical actuation is used for ejection, then precise control is achieved, but power requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection control precisionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping device uses periodic or intermittent suction application rather than continuous mechanical actuation. Suction is applied to grasp the egg, then periodically released to allow passive ejection through elastic finger movement or gravity, reducing power consumption compared to continuous motorized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The ejection mechanism uses the inherent elastic energy stored in compliant fingers or the weight of the egg itself to perform the ejection action, rather than requiring external power input. The system leverages natural physical phenomena to achieve ejection without active mechanical actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If suction-type lifting devices are used, then egg displacement is simple, but control over various egg shapes and orientations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement mechanism simplicityVSAvoidaccommodation of egg variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the gripping device have different properties - some fingers are stiffer for structural support while others are more compliant for adapting to egg contours. The suction cups may have varying sizes or stiffness to accommodate different egg shapes, providing localized adaptation while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping device is designed with universal features that allow it to handle various egg shapes, sizes, and orientations using the same basic mechanism. The compliant fingers and adjustable suction force provide multi-functionality without requiring separate mechanisms for different egg types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies egg handling, reduces the risk of cracking, improves maintenance ease, and adapts to various egg configurations, enhancing the reliability and efficiency of egg transfer processes.

Implementation Method 1

using resilient materials to grasp and release eggs securely

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10946995B2Egg transfer module having free-moving ejector, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 ZOETIS SERVICES LLC
  • US10946995B2 patent drawing
  • US10946995B2 patent drawing
  • US10946995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An egg transfer module is provided. Such a device includes an egg securing device configured to grasp an egg. A free-moving ejector is associated with the egg securing device and configured to freely move in relation thereto. An abutment is provided in spaced relationship to the egg securing device. The free-moving ejector is configured to interact with the abutment to cause movement of the free-moving ejector with respect to the egg securing device, thereby displacing the egg from the egg securing device. Associated systems and methods are also provided.