Ego-Vehicle Trajectory Selection via Predictive Behavior Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current driver assistance systems are limited in their ability to autonomously determine vehicle behavior and trajectory in complex traffic situations, as they primarily rely on driver-initiated commands and do not consider the interactions between the ego-vehicle and other traffic participants, leading to suboptimal safety and comfort.
Innovation Solution
A method that determines future behaviors and trajectories for the ego-vehicle by analyzing the current traffic situation, predicting the behaviors of surrounding vehicles, and optimizing trajectories based on safety and comfort parameters, taking into account the potential interactions and behaviors of all vehicles involved.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If the system autonomously determines behavior and trajectory considering entire traffic situation, then safety and comfort are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The method segments the complex traffic situation analysis into distinct components: identifying traffic participants, determining their behaviors, generating multiple future situations, and optimizing trajectories. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down the overall problem into manageable parts that can be processed systematically
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future behaviors of traffic participants and generating multiple possible future situations before finalizing the trajectory. This advance planning allows the system to evaluate potential scenarios and select optimal trajectories proactively, improving safety without requiring complex real-time reactions
2Loss of information
If the system analyzes entire traffic situation with multiple vehicles, then situation awareness is improved, but processing time and computational load increase
Solution Approach 1:
The method extracts only the relevant information needed for trajectory optimization from the complete traffic situation. By focusing on identified traffic participants and their predicted behaviors rather than processing all possible data, the system maintains comprehensive situation awareness while reducing unnecessary computational overhead
Solution Approach 2:
The system generates multiple future situations beyond what is strictly necessary, evaluating more scenarios than the minimum required. This excessive action ensures that the optimal trajectory is identified with high confidence by considering a comprehensive set of possibilities, while the structured approach prevents complete analysis paralysis
3Ease of operation
If the system optimizes trajectory based on multiple future situations, then comfort and safety are improved, but computational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically adjusts the trajectory optimization based on the evaluated future situations. By making the trajectory adaptive to predicted traffic participant behaviors and situational probabilities, the system achieves high comfort levels while managing computational complexity through structured dynamic optimization rather than exhaustive analysis
4Measurement precision
If the system predicts future behaviors of other vehicles, then trajectory accuracy is improved, but measurement and prediction difficulty increases
Solution Approach 1:
The method incorporates feedback mechanisms where predicted behaviors of traffic participants are continuously refined based on actual observed behaviors. This feedback loop improves trajectory accuracy over time by learning from discrepancies between predicted and actual traffic participant actions, reducing the inherent difficulty of prediction
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3~4
AI summary
The invention regards a method and vehicle for assisting an operator of an ego-vehicle in controlling the ego-vehicle by determining a future behavior and an associated trajectory for the ego-vehicle to be executed at first determines a situation currently encountered by the ego-vehicle, the current situation comprising the ego-vehicle and at least one other vehicle. Then, probabilities of future behaviors of the at least one other vehicle are computed based on the current situation for predicting future behaviors of the at least one other vehicle. Additionally, potential future behaviors of the ego-vehicle are determined and probabilities of a plurality of future situations possibly evolving from the current situation are computed based on combinations of the predicted future behaviors of the at least one other vehicle and the potential future behaviors of the ego-vehicle. Then, trajectories for associated behaviors are optimized for the ego-vehicle for at least some of these possible future situations and a trajectory is selected based at least on future situation probability. Since each trajectory is associated with one potential future behavior of the ego-vehicle, this selection of a trajectrory also means a selection of a particular behavior. Finally, a control signal to output information to the driver about the selected trajectory and/or to control actuators of the ego-vehicle so that the ego-vehicle follows the selected trajectory is generated.