Egocentric Graph Modeling for Tactical Driver Behavior Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional models are inadequate in effectively modeling complex interactions in automated driving scenarios, particularly in highly interactive environments, as they focus on single aspects of behavior rather than comprehensive spatial-temporal interactions between ego objects, reactive objects, and inert objects.

Innovation Solution

The proposed system employs an egocentric spatial-temporal interaction model using ego reactive graphs and ego inert graphs generated by a graph neural network to recognize tactical driver behavior, incorporating image data to identify reactive and inert objects and perform interaction modeling and temporal processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional models (hidden Markov models, dynamic Bayesian networks, recurrent neural networks) are used to recognize driving events, then basic driving behavior recognition is achieved, but complex interactions between drivers and environments cannot be effectively modeled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracy for complex interactionsVSAvoidcapability to handle complex interactive scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex driving environment into distinct object categories (reactive objects that respond to ego vehicle actions, inert objects that do not respond, and general objects). This segmentation allows the model to handle different interaction types separately, improving both modeling accuracy and adaptability to complex scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional sequence-based modeling to a graph-based spatial-temporal representation. By introducing spatial relationships through graph structures (nodes representing objects, edges representing interactions) and temporal dimensions through sequence modeling, the system captures multi-dimensional interaction patterns that conventional models cannot represent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If a comprehensive spatial-temporal interaction model is implemented to recognize tactical driver behavior, then recognition accuracy for complex interactions is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactical driver behavior recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex recognition task into modular components: object detection module, graph construction module (with ego-reactive and ego-inert subgraphs), interaction modeling module, and temporal modeling module. This segmentation reduces system complexity by making each component independent and manageable while maintaining high recognition accuracy through their coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The graph structure serves as an intermediary representation that bridges raw sensor data and tactical behavior recognition. The graph nodes and edges encode spatial relationships and interaction patterns, transforming complex multi-object scenarios into a structured format that is easier to process and analyze, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11460856B2System and method for tactical behavior recognition
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11460856B2 patent drawing
  • US11460856B2 patent drawing
  • US11460856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for driver behavior recognition is provided. In one embodiment a computer implemented method includes receiving image data associated with a general objects. The method also includes identifying a reactive object and an inert object from the general objects based on the image data. An ego reactive graph is generated for the reactive object based on a reactive feature of the reactive object and a reactive position vector. An ego inert graph is generated for the inert object based on an inert feature of the inert object and an inert distance. The method further includes performing interaction modeling based on the ego reactive graphs and the ego inert graphs to generate updated features. The method also includes performing temporal modeling on the updated features. The method further includes determining an egocentric representation of a tactical driver behavior based at least in part on the updated features.