EGR Valve Motor Control via Feedforward and PID Terms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing EGR valve control systems face challenges in maintaining stable response characteristics when the target opening is frequently changed, leading to insufficient follow-up capability and delays in response.

Innovation Solution

The EGR valve control system employs a motor control apparatus that computes an integral term based on the deviation between the target and actual positions, a proportional term based on the actual position change, a derivative term based on the actual position, and a feedforward term based on the target position change, and calculates the drive duty by adding and subtracting these terms to achieve stable control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If usual PID control is used when deviation is small to prioritize stability, then control stability is improved, but response time increases causing delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the control strategy based on the magnitude of deviation. When deviation is large, feedforward control is applied for fast response; when deviation is small, PID control is applied for stability. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction between stability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Feedforward control computes the required motor output in advance based on the target opening position, allowing the system to anticipate and prepare for the required action before the deviation becomes significant. This preliminary action reduces the overall response time while maintaining stability through subsequent PID control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If feedforward control is increased to improve response, then response speed is improved, but stability deteriorates causing overshooting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies feedforward control partially - only when the deviation is large. When deviation is small, the system switches to PID control which provides sufficient action for stability. This partial application of feedforward control avoids overshooting while maintaining fast response when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the control strategy based on the magnitude of deviation. When deviation is large, feedforward control is applied for fast response; when deviation is small, PID control is applied for stability. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction between stability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If PID control parameters are adjusted for fast response, then response time is reduced, but control stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the control strategy based on the magnitude of deviation. When deviation is large, feedforward control is applied for fast response; when deviation is small, PID control is applied for stability. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction between stability and response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8150601B2EGR valve control system
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC MOBILITY CORP
  • US8150601B2 patent drawing
  • US8150601B2 patent drawing
  • US8150601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An EGR valve control system includes a motor 5 exercising the opening and closing control of an EGR valve; a sensor 6 detecting the actual opening position of the EGR valve; and a motor control apparatus (control arithmetic section 1) computing a drive duty of the motor 5 based on a target opening position of the EGR valve and the actual opening position thereof detected by the sensor 6; and the control apparatus is arranged such that the control arithmetic section 1, when a target opening position of the EGR valve is set, computes an integral term based on the deviation between the target opening position and the actual opening position of the EGR valve, a proportional term and a differential term based on the change of the actual opening position of the EGR valve, and a feedforward term based on the change of the target opening position, respectively, and the control arithmetic section further exercises the opening and closing control of the EGR valve by computing the drive duty of the motor 5 by performing addition and subtraction on the computed integral term, proportional term, differential term, and feedforward term.