Liquid Ejecting Apparatus Suction Pore Design for Paper Warping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid ejecting apparatuses face challenges in maintaining stable image formation due to paper warping and cockling, leading to uneven ink droplet landing and reduced print quality, especially when handling transfer paper that swells and lifts, causing the printing surface to potentially contact the inkjet unit.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejecting apparatus with a medium supporting portion featuring a first suction pore with a larger hole diameter opposing the liquid ejecting unit, a second suction pore, and a third suction pore, all aligned along the transport direction, which provides a uniform suction force to stabilize the paper and prevent lifting, ensuring consistent image formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single suction pore is used to suck the medium, then the structure is simple, but the paper warps and cockles causing uneven ink droplet landing and reduced print quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage formation qualityVSAvoidsuction pore structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suction mechanism is divided into multiple suction pores (first, second, and third suction pores) positioned at different locations along the transport direction. Each suction pore independently contributes to holding the paper, with the first suction pore having a larger hole diameter to provide stronger suction at the printing position, thereby preventing paper warping and cockling while maintaining acceptable structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different suction pores are designed with different hole diameters to create localized suction characteristics. The first suction pore opposing the liquid ejecting unit has a larger hole diameter to provide stronger suction force where it is most needed for image quality, while other pores have smaller diameters, optimizing the suction distribution across the paper surface without uniformly increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the paper is strongly sucked to prevent lifting, then image formation stability improves, but the paper may be damaged or the image may be defective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage formation stabilityVSAvoidpaper damage and image defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The suction force is segmented across multiple pores rather than concentrated in one large pore. The first suction pore has a larger diameter to provide strong suction for stability, while the second and third pores with smaller diameters distribute additional suction force gradually, preventing any single point from exerting excessive force that could damage the paper or defect the image

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Stronger suction is locally applied at the first suction pore position where it is most critical for preventing paper lift during printing, while weaker suction is applied at other positions. This localized quality approach maintains image formation stability without uniformly over-sucking the paper, thereby avoiding damage and defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple suction pores with different hole diameters are used, then paper stability and image quality improve, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance uniformity between ejecting unit and paperVSAvoidsuction pore configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The suction system is segmented into three discrete pores with progressively different diameters, allowing the manufacturing process to be broken into standardized steps: creating the first larger pore, then the second and third smaller pores. This segmentation makes the complexity manageable through modular manufacturing approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design requires local quality differentiation only at specific positions (first pore larger, second and third pores smaller), rather than requiring complex variable geometry throughout. This localized differentiation simplifies manufacturing compared to fully variable designs, as only specific regions need precision variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus achieves stable image formation by uniformly maintaining the distance between the liquid ejecting unit and the paper, reducing defects and maintaining high print quality even with transfer paper that swells, by effectively adhering the paper to the supporting ribs and suction concave portions.

Implementation Method 1

a suction mechanism for sucking the medium; the first suction pore, the second suction pore and the third suction pore for actuating a suction force of the suction mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS9211732B2Liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.12.15 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9211732B2 patent drawing
  • US9211732B2 patent drawing
  • US9211732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus includes a liquid ejecting unit that ejects a liquid onto a medium which is transported in a transport direction; a suction mechanism for sucking the medium; and a medium supporting portion that supports the medium. The medium supporting portion includes a first suction pore, a second suction pore and a third suction pore for actuating a suction force of the suction mechanism, the first suction pore, the second suction pore and the third suction pore are disposed in order along the transport direction of the medium from an upstream side to a downstream side, the first suction pore is disposed at a position which opposes the liquid ejecting unit, and the first suction pore has a larger hole diameter than that of the second suction pore.