Liquid Ejecting Head Cavities with Hydrophobic Porous Coating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Liquid ejecting heads, such as ink jet recording heads, face challenges in maintaining favorable ejection properties over time due to ink evaporation, which increases viscosity and affects ejection performance.

Innovation Solution

The design includes nozzles, pressure generation chambers, a manifold substrate, a piezoelectric element housing unit, and cavities that are fluidly connected to the atmosphere through specific channels to control pressure fluctuations and prevent evaporation, maintaining a humid environment within the cavities to reduce ink viscosity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the cavity is open to the air to keep pressure constant, then pressure stability is improved, but ink evaporation increases causing viscosity rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure stabilityVSAvoidink evaporation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A hydrophobic porous coating is applied to the cavity surface to act as an intermediary layer. This coating allows pressure equalization while blocking ink evaporation by creating a barrier that prevents vapor transmission, thus resolving the contradiction between pressure stability and evaporation prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrophobic porous coating creates an inert environment within the cavity by preventing air-ink interaction. The coating's water-repellent properties establish a protective atmosphere that eliminates evaporation while maintaining pressure equilibrium with the external environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Loss of substance

If channel resistance is increased to prevent evaporation, then evaporation is reduced, but pressure equalization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporation preventionVSAvoidpressure equalization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A hydrophobic porous coating is applied to the cavity surface, creating a material structure with controlled porosity. The porous structure allows gas permeability for pressure equalization while the hydrophobic properties block liquid and vapor transmission, preventing evaporation without compromising pressure regulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The surface properties of the cavity are modified by applying a hydrophobic coating, changing parameters such as surface energy and wettability. This parameter change enables the cavity to simultaneously achieve evaporation prevention and pressure equalization without increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If ink viscosity is increased to improve ejection properties, then ejection performance is improved, but evaporation resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection propertiesVSAvoidevaporation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The evaporation prevention function is extracted from the ink formulation and transferred to the cavity surface coating. This allows the ink to maintain optimized viscosity for ejection while the hydrophobic porous coating independently provides evaporation protection, decoupling the two previously conflicting requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively prevents ink evaporation, maintaining stable ejection properties over a long period and ensuring consistent printing performance.

Implementation Method 1

A piezoelectric element forces ink out of the nozzles by causing the pressure within the pressure generation chambers to change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a vibrating element for absorbing pressure changes in the liquid within the manifolds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure fluctuation absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

there are thus situations where the water content within the ink evaporates from the cavity and causes a rise in the viscosity of the ink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS8905524B2Liquid ejecting head, liquid ejecting head unit, and liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.12.09 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8905524B2 patent drawing
  • US8905524B2 patent drawing
  • US8905524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting head includes nozzles for ejecting liquid; pressure generation chambers, each in fluid communication with one of the nozzles; and a manifold substrate with manifolds disposed therein. Each manifold supplies liquid to at least one of the pressure generation chambers. The liquid ejecting head also includes a head case with a piezoelectric element housing unit. Piezoelectric elements, for changing pressure of liquid within the pressure generation chambers, are provided in the piezoelectric element housing unit. The liquid ejecting head also includes a vibrating element for absorbing pressure changes in the liquid within the manifolds, cavities provided on the vibrating element at positions that correspond to positions of the manifolds, and an atmosphere exposure channel that fluidly connects one of the cavities to the atmosphere. At least one other one of the cavities is in fluid communication with the atmosphere exposure channel via the first cavity.