Ejecting Head Maintenance Prevents Nozzle Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-viscosity inks and larger discharge ports in fluid ejecting apparatuses cause damage during cleaning due to thickened ink being rubbed against nozzles, leading to ink being sucked into the ejecting head and leaving the discharge-port forming surface without sufficient fluid, resulting in damage and ink thickening.

Innovation Solution

A method involving capping processing followed by a waiting period without wiping, which allows fluid to be sucked into the ejecting head, preventing thickened fluid from being rubbed against the surface and maintaining the ejecting surface without wiping, along with temperature and time-based controls to manage fluid viscosity and evaporation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If wiping processing is performed after capping processing to remove fluid from the ejecting surface, then the ejecting surface appears clean, but thickened ink is rubbed against the nozzles causing damage to the discharge-port forming surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleanliness of ejecting surfaceVSAvoiddamage to discharge-port forming surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing capping processing before wiping processing. The cap member is placed on the ejecting surface to seal it, preventing fluid evaporation and thickening before the wiping operation. This ensures that any fluid present during wiping is already in a controlled state, preventing thickened ink from damaging the nozzles while still allowing the surface to be cleaned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If wiping processing is performed to maintain the ejecting surface, then the surface remains clean, but ink remaining on the surface is sucked into the ejecting head leaving insufficient fluid for cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleanliness of ejecting surfaceVSAvoidamount of fluid on ejecting surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cap member is placed on the ejecting surface before wiping to seal and protect it. This preliminary capping action prevents fluid from being sucked into the ejecting head during the wiping process, ensuring sufficient fluid remains on the surface for effective cleaning while maintaining surface cleanliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If capping processing is performed again to prevent fluid evaporation, then fluid thickening is prevented, but additional waiting time is required without wiping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid viscosity stabilityVSAvoidwaiting time without wiping
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action through the repeated capping and waiting cycles. After the initial capping and wiping, the cap member is placed on the ejecting surface again, and a waiting period is imposed before another wiping operation. This periodic capping prevents fluid evaporation and thickening, maintaining stable fluid composition while allowing controlled time intervals for maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents damage to the ejecting surface by avoiding wiping with thickened fluid, ensures fluid removal without evaporation, and maintains ejection performance by smoothing meniscuses through flushing.

Implementation Method 1

fluid attached to the vicinities of the ejecting ports in the ejecting surface can be sucked into the ejecting head through the ejecting ports due to the difference in pressure between inside and outside the ejecting head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

wiping processing to wipe the ejecting surface with the wiping member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8025357B2Fluid ejecting apparatus and ejecting head maintenance method
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8025357B2 patent drawing
  • US8025357B2 patent drawing
  • US8025357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for maintaining a fluid ejecting apparatus including an ejecting head that has an ejecting surface in which a plurality of ejecting ports that eject fluid are formed, and a maintenance portion that performs maintenance processing to recover the ejection of fluid from the ejecting ports and that has a cap member and a wiping member. The method includes performing capping processing to put the cap member on the ejecting surface and to suck, and then wiping processing to wipe the ejecting surface with the wiping member, and performing the capping processing again and then waiting a predetermined time without performing the wiping processing.