Liquid Ejection Apparatus Capping Mechanism Moisturization Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The efficiency of maintenance in liquid ejection apparatuses is compromised when the time length of opening the ejection space to the surrounding space is not accounted for during moisturization, leading to prolonged restoration or maintenance of the liquid state in the ejection opening.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejection apparatus with a capping mechanism, discharger, inflow and outflow paths, moisturization mechanism, ventilator, and controller that determines changes in the capping mechanism's state and adjusts the air supply and liquid discharge based on the duration of the uncapped state to optimize maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the capping mechanism is opened to the surrounding space during moisturization, then the user can move the liquid ejection apparatus, but the maintenance efficiency deteriorates and extra time is required to restore the liquid state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility during moisturizationVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the moisturization process based on the capping mechanism state. When the capping mechanism transitions from capped to uncapped state during moisturization, the controller detects this change and modifies the moisturization timing accordingly, allowing the process to adapt to operational needs while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller monitors the state of the capping mechanism and uses this feedback to determine whether to continue, pause, or extend the moisturization process. This feedback loop enables the system to respond to opening events and adjust maintenance timing to compensate for exposure to surrounding air.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the moisturization is conducted in the same condition irrespective of the time length of opening, then the control is simple, but the maintenance efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol complexityVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The moisturization control transitions from a static fixed-time approach to a dynamic adaptive approach. The controller adjusts moisturization duration and timing based on detected opening events and their duration, optimizing maintenance effectiveness for each specific operational scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the moisturization parameters (timing and duration) based on the observed opening time length. When the capping mechanism remains uncapped for extended periods, the controller extends moisturization duration or adjusts timing to ensure adequate moisture restoration, adapting parameters to match actual exposure conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for efficient maintenance of the liquid ejection apparatus even when the capping mechanism changes from a capped to an uncapped state, ensuring timely restoration or maintenance of the liquid state in the ejection opening by adjusting air supply and liquid discharge accordingly.

Implementation Method 1

The moisturization mechanism is configured to moisturize the air passing through the inflow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoisturization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

The ventilator is configured to move the air in the inflow path to the ejection space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS8936345B2Liquid ejection apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.01.20 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US8936345B2 patent drawing
  • US8936345B2 patent drawing
  • US8936345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A capping mechanism selectively takes a capped state in which an ejection space opposing an ejection surface is covered or an uncapped state in which the ejection space is not covered. A controller is configured to: determine whether a first change of the capping mechanism from the capped state to the uncapped state occurred while air moisturized by a moisturization mechanism is being moved to the ejection space by a ventilator or not; and when a second change of the capping mechanism from the uncapped state to the capped state occurred after the first change occurred, control the ventilator to move the air moisturized by the moisturization mechanism to the ejection space when a first uncapped time is shorter than a first predetermined time, and control a discharger to discharge the liquid through ejection openings when the first uncapped time is not shorter than the first predetermined time.