Liquid Ejection Head Gas Blowing Port Vortex Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink-jet printing technologies face challenges in achieving high-quality images due to airflow-generated vortices that cause deviations in ink droplet landing positions, leading to streaks and turbulence, especially when increasing ink ejection port density or frequency, which can destabilize vortices and reduce image quality.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejection head with a gas blowing port array that blows gas upstream of the airflow between the print head and the printing medium, adjusting the airflow orientation and reducing the size of vortices by controlling the gas blowing speed and position relative to the ink ejection ports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If gas is introduced at high flow rate to eliminate vortices, then vortex generation is reduced, but landing positions of ink droplets deviate significantly from desired positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevortex generationVSAvoidlanding position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing gas at specific locations (upstream side of the airflow between print head and printing medium) rather than uniformly throughout the entire space. This localized gas introduction targets the vortex generation area while minimizing impact on droplet trajectories, resolving the contradiction between vortex elimination and landing position accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by introducing gas at controlled, moderate flow rates rather than high flow rates. This partial gas introduction is sufficient to stabilize vortices and reduce wind ripples while avoiding excessive gas flow that would cause significant deviation of ink droplet landing positions from desired locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If ejection port density is increased to achieve high-speed printing, then printing speed improves, but vortex stability decreases causing wind ripples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidvortex stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by introducing gas upstream of the airflow area before vortices fully develop. This preliminary gas introduction creates a stabilizing effect that prevents vortex formation and wind ripples from occurring in the first place, allowing high ejection port density to be used without compromising image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Productivity

If ejection frequency is increased to achieve high-speed printing, then printing speed improves, but vortex instability increases causing wind ripples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidvortex stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by introducing gas upstream of the airflow area before droplets are ejected and before vortices can form. This preliminary gas introduction creates a stable airflow environment that maintains vortex stability even when ejection frequency is increased, preventing wind ripples while preserving high printing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively stabilizes the landing positions of ink droplets, reducing wind ripples and improving image quality by minimizing the disturbance caused by airflow vortices, even at higher ejection frequencies and densities, without significantly affecting the airflow.

Implementation Method 1

The gas blowing port blows gas to an upstream side of an airflow generated in an area between an ejection port surface of the ejection port array and the printing medium while the liquid ejection head is moving relative to the printing medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow:

Implementation Method 2

The liquid ejection head blows the gas from the gas blowing port at a predetermined speed during ejection of the droplets to change the orientation of an airflow of a vortex generated due to the ejection of the droplets to reduce the size of the vortex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentUS9656474B2Liquid ejection head and apparatus and method for printing
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 CANON KK
  • US9656474B2 patent drawing
  • US9656474B2 patent drawing
  • US9656474B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Gas is blown at a predetermined speed from a predetermined area on an orifice substrate with reference to the position of an ejection port array.