Ejection Seat Acceleration Scalar Timing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ejection seat systems face challenges in ensuring safe ejection of aircrew from aircraft due to varying crew sizes, leading to potential injuries from mismatched acceleration levels, as smaller crew members experience higher accelerations and larger crew members may not clear the aircraft or terrain effectively.

Innovation Solution

An ejection seat system that uses an accelerometer and controller to calculate the change in velocity and adjust the ejection sequence timing based on a scalar value, categorizing aircrew size as small, medium, or large to optimize parachute deployment and clearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed ejection sequence timing is used for all crew sizes, then the ejection system is simple to operate, but smaller crew members experience higher accelerations leading to potential injuries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection system operationVSAvoidacceleration injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ejection sequence timing is made dynamic by continuously monitoring acceleration data from accelerometers and adjusting the timing parameters in real-time based on the actual acceleration profile experienced by the crew member. This allows the system to adapt to different crew sizes and masses, preventing excessive acceleration forces on smaller crew members while maintaining effectiveness for larger crew members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where acceleration data from multiple accelerometers is continuously fed back to the control unit. The control unit processes this data and adjusts the ejection sequence timing accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes safety for varying crew sizes without requiring manual input from the crew member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If a fixed ejection sequence timing is used for all crew sizes, then the system complexity is reduced, but larger crew members may not clear the aircraft or terrain effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection sequence controlVSAvoidejection clearance speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The ejection sequence timing parameters are dynamically adjusted based on real-time acceleration profiling. The system continuously monitors the acceleration profile and modifies the timing of ejection events to ensure adequate clearance speed for larger crew members while preventing excessive acceleration for smaller crew members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Acceleration feedback from sensors is used to continuously optimize the ejection sequence timing. The control unit processes acceleration data and adjusts timing parameters to ensure that larger crew members achieve sufficient clearance speed from both aircraft and terrain, while maintaining safety for smaller crew members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If acceleration-based timing adjustment is implemented, then safety for varying crew sizes is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-characterization by automatically profiling the acceleration characteristics of each crew member during the ejection sequence. The control unit autonomously processes acceleration data from multiple sensors and adjusts timing parameters without requiring manual input, crew member classification, or pre-programming, thereby improving safety while minimizing the operational complexity burden on the crew member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-affected harmful factors

If real-time acceleration monitoring is used, then injury prevention for smaller crew members is improved, but the measurement and control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration injury riskVSAvoidacceleration data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple accelerometers provide continuous acceleration feedback that is processed by the control unit. This feedback mechanism enables real-time detection and measurement of acceleration forces, allowing the system to identify when acceleration levels become hazardous for smaller crew members and adjust timing parameters accordingly to prevent injury.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system improves aircrew safety by tailoring the ejection sequence to the aircrew size, reducing injury risk for smaller crew members and ensuring terrain clearance for larger ones by adjusting the timing of parachute deployment.

Implementation Method 1

receiving, by a processor, a first acceleration data from an accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The catapult stage fires first, ejecting the ejection seat and any occupant of the ejection seat from the aircraft cockpit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatapult propulsion: Catapult Effect

Implementation Method 3

The rocket stage then ignites and propels the ejection seat and its occupant to a separation distance from the aircraft and terrain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRocket propulsion: Rocket

Implementation Method 4

The main parachute is then deployed and the ejection seat and occupant are decelerated to a safe velocity for recovery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParachute drag: Parachute

Data Source

PatentUS20240319225A1Acceleration based mass scalar determination
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US20240319225A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319225A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319225A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed herein. The method includes receiving, by a processor, a first acceleration data from an accelerometer, calculating, by the processor, a change in velocity based on the first acceleration data, the change in velocity being calculated over a first period of time, and adjusting, by the processor, a timing sequence based on the change in velocity.