Ejector-Driven Gas Recycle in Membrane Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas separation processes require significant energy for recompressing recycle gas, increasing operational costs and complexity due to the need for rotating equipment, especially when achieving high recovery and purity levels in multi-step processes.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid gas separation process utilizing a membrane separation step followed by a partial pressure-driven flow-through step, such as partial condensation, absorption, or pressure swing adsorption, with an ejector to recycle non-product gas, eliminating the need for recompression by converting pressure energy into velocity energy and back, using a device like an ejector with no moving parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a recycle compressor is used to repressurize recycle gas in multi-step membrane separation processes, then product recovery is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct recoveryVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the compression function with the existing feed compressor by routing recycle gas through the feed compressor inlet, merging two compression needs into a single equipment operation and eliminating the requirement for a separate recycle compressor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The feed compressor is made multi-functional by designing it to handle both fresh feed gas and recycle gas, allowing a single piece of equipment to perform multiple compression tasks that would traditionally require separate compressors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If a recycle compressor is installed in the processing loop, then product recovery is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct recoveryVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the recycle gas compression function into the feed compressor system, combining multiple equipment functions into fewer units and simplifying the overall process flow configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The feed compressor is designed to serve dual purposes by compressing both feed gas and recycle gas, reducing the total number of equipment items and simplifying plant layout and operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If a recycle compressor is used to repressurize recycle gas, then product purity is improved, but capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the compression capability needed for both feed and recycle streams into a single feed compressor unit, eliminating capital expenditure on an additional recycle compressor and associated balance of plant equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The feed compressor is designed with multi-functional capability to handle both fresh feed and recycle gas streams, reducing total equipment count and associated capital costs while maintaining required product purity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption and capital costs by simplifying the equipment needed, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of gas separation while maintaining high recovery and purity levels, particularly when the total stage cut is at least 40%, thereby minimizing the recycle stream back to the ejector.

Implementation Method 1

an ejector to recycle the non-product gas and drive the gas flow in the loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure energy conversion: Bernoulli Effect

Implementation Method 2

a gas mixture is passed over a semi-permeable membrane. The back (permeate) side of the membrane is maintained at a considerably lower pressure than the feed side; as a result, a portion of the gas mixture permeates the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective permeation: Semipermeable Membrane

Data Source

PatentUS9017451B2Membrane-based gas separation process using ejector-driven gas recycle
Publication Date: 2015.04.28 MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH INC
  • US9017451B2 patent drawing
  • US9017451B2 patent drawing
  • US9017451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas separation process that utilizes ejector recycle with a membrane separation step in combination with a second separation step. The second separation step may be a second membrane separation, or may involve a different type of separation process. At least a portion of the non-product (i.e. residue) stream withdrawn from the second separation step is directed back to the ejector to form a processing loop. The ejector drives the gas flow in the loop and recycles the non-product stream to the first separation step.