Sheet Processing Device Ejector Noise Reduction via Segmented Motor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet processing devices generate impact noise when the ejector returns to its home position, which can be mitigated by using a spring, but this increases the device size, and existing solutions that use motors to decelerate the ejector may not effectively suppress noise.

Innovation Solution

The device employs a separate second motor to drive the bundle pawl, allowing the ejector to be decelerated smoothly by reducing the output of the first motor, eliminating the need for a spring and minimizing device size, while using a shared power transmission system to support both motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a spring is used as a power source for returning the ejector to the home position, then the impact noise when the ejector is stopped can be suppressed, but the device is likely to be increased in size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact noiseVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The power transmission system is segmented into two independent systems: a first power transmission system (belt and pulley) for driving the ejector, and a second power transmission system (gear mechanism) for driving the bundle pawl. This segmentation allows the ejector to be decelerated smoothly by controlling the first motor without requiring a spring mechanism, thereby suppressing impact noise while maintaining a compact device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-based mechanical energy storage system is replaced with an electric motor control system. The first motor (stepping motor) controls the ejector's movement and deceleration through electronic control, eliminating the need for a spring mechanism and associated space, thus reducing device size while effectively suppressing impact noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the ejector is configured to be driven by a motor to decelerate the ejector in front of the home position, then the impact noise generated at the time of stopping can be suppressed, but the device is likely to be increased in size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact noiseVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first motor serves multiple functions: it drives the ejector during sheet conveyance and also controls the ejector's deceleration before returning to the home position. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate deceleration mechanisms, reducing device complexity and size while suppressing impact noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The ejector's motion is dynamically controlled by the first motor, which can adjust its output to decelerate the ejector in front of the home position. This dynamic control allows smooth stopping without impact noise, avoiding the need for additional mechanical components that would increase device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a separate second motor is provided to drive the bundle pawl, then the ejector can be decelerated smoothly by reducing the output of the first motor, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet conveyance reliabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power transmission system is divided into two independent systems: the first power transmission system (belt and pulley) for the ejector, and the second power transmission system (gear mechanism) for the bundle pawl. This segmentation allows independent control of each component, improving sheet conveyance reliability while using compact, standard mechanical components that do not significantly increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10696084B1Sheet processing device and image processing system
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US10696084B1 patent drawing
  • US10696084B1 patent drawing
  • US10696084B1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a sheet processing device includes a moving member, an extrusion member, a first motor, a second motor, a first power transmission unit, a second power transmission unit, and a shaft. The first motor drives the moving member. The second motor drives the extrusion member. The second motor is a motor separated from the first motor. The first power transmission unit includes a first rotor. The first power transmission unit transfers power from the first motor to the moving member. The second power transmission unit includes a second rotor. The second power transmission unit transfers power from the second motor to the extrusion member. The shaft supports the first rotor and the second rotor.