Elastic Cage Freewheeling Element With Integrated Load Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional freewheeling elements, such as sprag clutches, lack load-bearing capacity due to their non-bearing properties, necessitating additional mounting and the use of external metallic springs for support.

Innovation Solution

A freewheeling element incorporating a cage with higher elasticity than the sprags and rolling bodies, featuring equidistantly distributed rolling-body pockets and snap-fit connections, which integrates load-bearing capacity and eliminates the need for external springs, using materials like polyamide with glass-fiber reinforcement for the cage and metallic or ceramic materials for the sprags and rolling bodies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional sprag clutches are used, then the freewheeling functionality is achieved, but the load-bearing capacity is insufficient requiring additional mounting and external springs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidadditional mounting and external springs
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the load-bearing function with the freewheeling element itself by integrating rolling bodies into the cage structure. The rolling bodies are accommodated in rolling-body pockets formed in the cage, combining the support function and the freewheeling function into a single integrated component, eliminating the need for separate mounting structures and external springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage with rolling bodies serves itself by providing both the structural framework and the load-bearing capability. The rolling bodies automatically provide support when needed without requiring external assistance from separate springs or mounting structures, making the system self-sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If metallic springs are used to provide load-bearing capacity, then the support function is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the spring-loading function from separate metallic spring components and transfers it to the cage structure itself. The cage is designed with elastic properties and rolling-body pockets that provide the necessary support function, eliminating the need for distinct spring components and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the structural framework, accommodates the rolling bodies for load-bearing support, and enables the freewheeling mechanism. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated spring components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the cage has high elasticity to act as a resilient element, then external springs can be dispensed with, but the positional stability of rolling bodies may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelimination of external springsVSAvoidpositional stability of rolling bodies
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is designed with differentiated local properties: the overall cage structure has high elasticity to provide resilient support and eliminate external springs, while the rolling-body pockets are designed with specific geometric features (such as conical surfaces or latching mechanisms) that provide localized positional stability for the rolling bodies. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between elasticity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced load-bearing capacity and positional stability while maintaining the freewheeling functionality, allowing for uniform support and adjustable spring-loading behavior without the need for external springs, thereby improving the overall performance of the freewheeling element.

Implementation Method 1

The cage (10) has a higher level of elasticity than the sprags (20) and the rolling bodies (30)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The rolling bodies (30) are accommodated in the rolling-body pockets (12) in a form-fitting manner, in particular in the manner of a latching or snap-fit connection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSnap-fit connection: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS11867241B2Freewheeling element
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 PAUL MULLER GMBH & CO KG UNTERNEHMENSBETEILIGUNGEN
  • US11867241B2 patent drawing
  • US11867241B2 patent drawing
  • US11867241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a freewheeling element comprising a cage, a plurality of clamping bodies, each of the clamping bodies being received in an associated clamping body pocket formed in the cage, and a plurality of rolling bodies, each of the rolling bodies being received in an associated rolling body pocket formed in the cage, the cage having a higher resilience than the clamping bodies and the rolling bodies.