Elastic Vehicle Door Edge Protector for Damage-Free Contact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle doors, particularly in the aeronautical field, face challenges in maintaining precise adjustments between the door and fuselage skins to prevent contact during flight deformations and vibrations, which can lead to damage and hinder door operation, while also compromising aerodynamic performance.

Innovation Solution

A field protector is integrated with the door skin, made of elastic material with a specific profile, allowing contact between the door and fuselage without damage, maintaining aerodynamic performance by reducing the need for precise adjustments and ensuring the door can open post-contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If precise adjustments are made to centering stops to prevent skin contact, then damage prevention is improved, but installation complexity increases and aerodynamic performance deteriorates due to increased clearance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A field protector made of elastic material is introduced as an intermediary element between the door skin and the fuselage skin. This protector absorbs contact forces during vibrations and minor crashes, preventing direct skin-to-skin contact and damage without requiring precise adjustment of centering stops. The elastic material deforms to accommodate clearance variations while maintaining protection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameter by using elastic material for the field protector instead of rigid stops. This allows the system to tolerate a range of clearance values (2-5mm) without requiring precise adjustment, as the elastic material adapts to different clearance conditions while still preventing damage through controlled deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If clearance between centering stops is increased to simplify installation, then ease of manufacture is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates due to increased gap between skins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The field protector's elastic properties enable the system to function effectively across a range of clearance values (2-5mm). This parameter range allows manufacturers to use larger clearances for easier installation and assembly, while the elastic protector maintains aerodynamic smoothness by deforming to fill gaps during normal operation, thus preserving aerodynamic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The field protector transitions from a static rigid stop to a dynamic elastic element that adapts its shape and position based on operational conditions. During installation, it accommodates larger clearances; during flight, it deforms to maintain aerodynamic continuity, thus resolving the conflict between installation ease and aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If field protector is made sufficiently rigid to maintain aerodynamic performance, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but reliability deteriorates as the door may jam during minor crashes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoiddoor opening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The field protector uses elastic material with specific mechanical properties that provide sufficient rigidity to maintain aerodynamic performance during normal flight conditions, while simultaneously possessing enough flexibility to deform and allow door opening during minor crashes. The elastic modulus and geometric design are optimized to balance these conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The field protector's dynamic response varies with the magnitude of applied forces. Under normal aerodynamic pressures, it maintains a rigid configuration for aerodynamic efficiency. Under extreme forces during minor crashes, it transitions to a flexible state that allows door movement, thus resolving the contradiction between aerodynamic performance and emergency functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If field protector allows contact between door and fuselage skins, then ease of operation is improved, but damage risk increases without protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operation toleranceVSAvoidskin damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The field protector serves as a protective intermediary layer between the door skin and fuselage skin. It allows contact forces to be transmitted through the elastic material rather than directly between the skins, preventing damage while enabling the door to operate through vibrations and minor crashes without jamming. The elastic deformation absorbs impact energy and prevents permanent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The field protector reduces installation complexity by allowing increased clearance tolerance, preserving door functionality and aerodynamics by minimizing deflection and friction, while ensuring the door can open without damaging the skins.

Implementation Method 1

having sufficient flexibility in a direction parallel to the clearance between the skins so that, in the event of a minor accident, the skins remain at a distance greater than a minimum distance of 3 mm when the centering stops come into contact, while having a transverse rigidity in the internal-external direction limiting a deflection of the protector to 2 mm under a pressure differential from the inside to the outside of 1 psi (69 mBar) due to the aerodynamic flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4363310B1Antiblocking vehicle door edge protector
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 LATECOERE
  • EP4363310B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4363310B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4363310B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an assembly of a vehicle door and of a panel (1) surrounding the door (3), wherein an edge protector (4) extends along the skin of a vehicle door (3a) next to the skin of the panel (1a) and has a portion that is interposed between the skins (1a, 3a), following, in a nominal position, the geometric alignment of the outer faces thereof. This edge protector (4) has a changing profile in the middle portion (4b) and is made up of an elastic material such that it exhibits sufficient flexibility in a direction parallel to the distance between the skins (1a, 3a) and a transverse stiffness in the internal-external direction, and such that the contact of the edge protector with the skin of the panel (1a) does not block the opening of the door or damage the skins (1a, 3a).