Elastic Shoulder Brace With Reconfigurable Anatomic Interaction Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing elastic braces for joints are not versatile enough to address both stabilization and immobilization needs for sports injuries and pathological conditions like hemiplegia/hemiparesis, requiring separate braces and lacking adaptability to varying injury intensities and positions.

Innovation Solution

A flexible, multi-layer elastic brace with an anatomic interaction element that can be manually configured for different mechanical actions, allowing for both stabilization and traction functions, adaptable to various joint requirements and sizes, and easy to apply independently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate braces are used for sports injuries and pathological conditions, then each brace can be optimized for its specific function, but the user must purchase and manage multiple braces, increasing cost and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional optimizationVSAvoidbrace versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The elastic brace is designed with a universal structure that can perform multiple functions: it provides stabilization for sports injuries through its main body and closing means, and simultaneously enables traction action for pathological conditions like hemiplegia through the addition of an anatomic interaction element. This single device replaces the need for separate braces for different medical conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The brace is divided into distinct functional modules: a main body with closing means for stabilization, and a separate anatomic interaction element with multiple end portions that can be selectively positioned. This segmentation allows the user to configure the brace differently depending on whether sports injury stabilization or pathological traction is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single brace is designed to provide both stabilization and traction actions, then versatility and cost-effectiveness improve, but the device complexity and configuration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrace versatilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anatomic interaction element is designed to be movable and reconfigurable, allowing users to manually position its end portions at different locations on the arm according to their specific needs. The element can be moved between various configurations to provide either stabilization or traction actions, making the device adaptable without requiring complex mechanical mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The brace is designed to be easily configured by the user themselves without requiring professional assistance. The anatomic interaction element can be manually positioned and secured using simple fastening means, allowing patients to adjust the brace for different conditions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Force

If the brace structure is made more rigid to provide consistent traction action for pathological conditions, then the traction effectiveness improves, but the comfort and ease of application decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction force consistencyVSAvoidapplication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The brace utilizes the elastic properties of the material to provide consistent traction force. The elastic nature of the brace allows it to maintain a steady tensile force on the arm without requiring a rigid structure, thereby preserving comfort and ease of application while still achieving the necessary therapeutic traction effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The brace provides a versatile, cost-effective, and comfortable solution for joints, enabling both stabilization and traction actions based on the specific pathology, improving practicality and adaptability to different injury types and severities.

Implementation Method 1

a main portion made of elasticated fabric to be worn by the user so as to be wrapped around the area corresponding to the deltoid (shoulder)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The strip is generally adjusted through traction and anchoring systems, for example using Velcro to adapt the tensile force to the size of the user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3034052B1Elastic shoulder brace
Publication Date: 2017.08.02 TENORTHO S R L UNIPERSONALE
  • EP3034052B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3034052B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3034052B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4d

AI summary

An elastic brace (1) comprising: a main body (2), made of flexible material at least partially wrappable around a respective joint to be treated; closing means (3) coupled to said main body (2) to engage said main body (2) in a stable way onto the joint; and an anatomic interaction element (4) that can be associated with said main body (2) in a plurality of operating configurations each of which corresponds to a respective mechanical action that the brace (1) performs on the joint.