Elastic Display Stand Linkage for Heavy Screen Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing display stands face challenges in securely supporting and adjusting larger displays due to increased weight, leading to difficulties in smooth height, angle, and distance adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A display device with a structure that includes an upper arm, a lower arm, a base, a joint, a first elastic member, a second elastic member, an inner bar, and an outer bar, allowing for the folding and unfolding of the display stand and minimizing deformation of support links by increasing their rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the display size is increased, then the display area is improved, but the weight of the display increases making it difficult for the stand to securely support and adjust smoothly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay areaVSAvoiddisplay weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stand is divided into multiple segments (base, lower arm, upper arm, support link) that can move independently relative to each other. This segmentation allows the stand to support heavier displays by distributing the load across multiple joints and mechanical advantage points, enabling smooth adjustment despite increased weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stand employs dynamic elements including elastic members (springs) that provide continuous adaptive support force, and foldable link mechanisms that allow the stand to adjust its configuration. This dynamic design enables the stand to accommodate varying display weights and positions, maintaining smooth adjustability even as display size and weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If the stand structure is made more rigid to support heavier displays, then the support stability is improved, but the ease of folding and unfolding is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidfolding and unfolding ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stand uses elastic members (springs) integrated into the foldable link mechanism to provide continuous support force during folding and unfolding operations. This dynamic element allows the structure to maintain rigidity and stability when extended while remaining flexible and easy to manipulate during folding operations, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The elastic members change their mechanical parameters (force, stiffness) based on the extension state of the stand. When the stand is folded, the elastic members are compressed and ready to provide support force; when extended, they provide continuous stabilizing force. This parameter change allows the same structure to be both easy to fold and stable when deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the support link rigidity is increased to minimize deformation, then the structural stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport link rigidityVSAvoidstand structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support function is segmented across multiple components (base, lower arm, upper arm, support link with elastic members) rather than requiring a single overly complex rigid structure. Each segment can be optimized for its specific function, achieving overall structural stability without excessive complexity in any single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support link employs composite construction combining rigid structural elements with elastic members (springs). This composite approach provides the necessary rigidity to minimize deformation under load while the elastic components absorb stress and simplify the overall structure compared to a purely rigid design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables stable and smooth adjustments of display stands, even with heavier displays, by facilitating folding and unfolding mechanisms and enhancing the rigidity of support links, thus preventing deformation and ensuring optimal support.

Implementation Method 1

a first elastic member providing an elastic force to the lower arm with respect to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a second elastic member providing an elastic force to the upper arm with respect to the joint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250081370A1Display device
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US20250081370A1 patent drawing
  • US20250081370A1 patent drawing
  • US20250081370A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A display device is disclosed. The display device may include: a display; an upper arm coupled to a rear of the display; a lower arm to which the upper arm is hingedly connected; a base to which the lower arm is hingedly connected; a joint connecting the upper arm and the lower arm; a first elastic member providing an elastic force to the lower arm with respect to the base; a second elastic member providing an elastic force to the upper arm with respect to the joint; an inner bar having opposite ends pivotably coupled to the base and the joint; and an outer bar having opposite ends pivotably coupled the base and the joint.