Elastic Tapping Head Structure for Delayed Rebound Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hammers and mallets with rigid tapping faces generate instant rebound reaction forces, leading to reduced tapping efficiency, discomfort, and increased noise, affecting the smoothness and control of operations in industrial, medical, and golfing applications.

Innovation Solution

A force-limiting and damping device with an elastic element mounted between the tapping segment and the body, providing a damping effect by converting reaction forces into potential energy, thus increasing the contacting time and reducing noise and discomfort, featuring an adjustable locking mechanism to alter elastic tension.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid tapping face is used, then the structure is simple and strong, but an instant rebound reaction force is generated causing discomfort and reduced control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetapping face strengthVSAvoidcontrol smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the tapping face from rigid to elastic by introducing an elastic element. This allows the tapping face to deform elastically during impact, absorbing rebound energy and reducing the instant reaction force that causes discomfort and reduces control. The elastic deformation parameter enables the system to transition between rigid and compliant states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining the body (rigid component) with an elastic element (flexible component). This composite design allows the tapping face to exhibit both strength from the rigid body and comfort from the elastic element, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and operational comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If a rigid tapping face is used, then the structure is simple, but the contacting time is short reducing tapping efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidtapping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces elastic deformation as a new parameter that extends the contact duration. During impact, the elastic element compresses and then rebounds, naturally extending the contacting time between the tapping face and the workpiece. This prolonged contact time allows for more effective energy transfer and improves tapping efficiency without significantly complicating the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a rigid tapping face is used, then the device is simple, but noise and energy loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful instant rebound reaction force into a beneficial damping effect. The elastic element captures the rebound energy through elastic deformation and dissipates it gradually, transforming the harmful noise and energy loss into useful damping that reduces noise and improves energy utilization. The rebound force that previously caused harm now serves to extend contact time and reduce noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device enhances tapping efficiency by reducing nail bending or deflection, minimizing noise and energy loss, and providing user comfort by stabilizing the tool and allowing precise control, while being easily adjustable for different applications.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic element (30) mounted on the mounting segment (21) between the connecting segment (11) and the tapping segment (22)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3560450B1Force-limiting and damping device
Publication Date: 2021.09.22 SHIH JUI YUAN
  • EP3560450B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3560450B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3560450B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A force-limiting and damping device has a body (10), a tapping element (20), and an elastic element (30D). The body (10) has a connecting segment (11D) and a holding segment (12). The connecting segment (11D) has a mounting hole (111D). The tapping element (20D) is connected to the body (10) to move relative to the connecting segment (11D). The elastic element (30D) is mounted between the tapping element (20D) and the connecting segment (11D). The structural relationship between the connecting segment (11D), the tapping element (20D), and the elastic element (30D) may provide a delayed rebound and damping effect to the reaction force, and the applied force is continuously transferred to a tapping object to reduce noise and the loss of energy.